BAGHDAD—The US is abandoning plans to keep US troops in Iraq past a year-end withdrawal deadline, The Associated Press has learned. The decision to pull out fully by January will effectively end more than eight years of US involvement in the Iraq war, despite ongoing concerns about its security forces and the potential for instability.The decision ends months of hand-wringing by US officials over whether to stick to a December 31 withdrawal deadline that was set in 2008 or negotiate a new security agreement to ensure that gains made and more than 4,400 American military lives lost since March 2003 do not go to waste.
In recent months, Washington has been discussing with Iraqi leaders the possibility of several thousand American troops remaining to continue training Iraqi security forces. A Pentagon spokesman said on Saturday no final decision has been reached about the US training relationship with the Iraqi government.
But a senior Obama administration official in Washington confirmed on Saturday that all American troops will leave Iraq except for about 160 active-duty soldiers attached to the US Embassy. A senior US military official confirmed the departure and said the withdrawal could allow future but limited US military training missions in Iraq if requested. Both officials spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.
Throughout the discussions, Iraqi leaders have adamantly refused to give US troops immunity from prosecution in Iraqi courts, and the Americans have refused to stay without it. Iraq’s leadership has been split on whether it wanted American forces to stay. Some argued the further training and US help was vital, particularly to protect Iraq’s airspace and gather security intelligence. But others have deeply opposed any American troop presence, including Shiite militiamen who have threatened attacks on any American forces who remain.
Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has told US military officials that he does not have the votes in parliament to provide immunity to the American trainers, the US military official said.
A western diplomatic official in Iraq said al-Maliki told international diplomats he will not bring the immunity issue to parliament because lawmakers will not approve it.
A White House spokesman, Tommy Vietor, said discussions with Iraq about the security relationship between the two countries next year were ongoing.
Pentagon Press Secretary George Little said the US remains “committed to keeping our agreement with the Iraqi government to remove all of our troops by the end of this year.”
“At the same time, we’re building a comprehensive partnership with Iraq under the Strategic Framework Agreement including a robust security relationship, and discussions with the Iraqis about the nature of that relationship are ongoing,” Little said.
The Strategic Framework Agreement allows for other forms of military cooperation besides US troops on the ground. Signed at the same time as the security accord mandating the departure deadlines, it provides outlines for the US-Iraqi relationship in such areas as economic, cultural and security cooperation.
Iraqi lawmakers excel at last-minute agreements. But with little wiggle room on the immunity issue and the US military needing to move equipment out as soon as possible, a last-minute change between now and December 31 seems almost out of the question.
Regardless of whether US troops are here or not, there will be a massive American diplomatic presence. The US Embassy in Baghdad is the largest in the world, and the State Department will have offices in Basra, Irbil and Kirkuk, as well as other locations around the country where contractors will train Iraqi forces on US military equipment they’re purchasing.
About 5,000 security contractors and personnel will be tasked with helping protect American diplomats and facilities around the country, the State Department has said. The US Embassy will still have a handful of US Marines for protection and 157 US military personnel in charge of facilitating weapons sales to Iraq.
(AP)
