DAVOS, Switzerland—In a world troubled by grave uncertainties over the basics governing trade, security and the mission to limit climate change, President Xi Jinping of China on Tuesday portrayed his nation as a responsible global citizen dedicated to furthering international integration.
That a leader of the People’s Republic of China can stake a claim to the mantle of leadership in the realm of free trade speaks to the unforeseen, even surreal alteration of the global order in recent months.
His message, delivered here in the Swiss Alps at the annual gathering of the World Economic Forum (WEF), appeared meticulously timed to the tumultuous moment at hand. He was speaking three days before Donald J. Trump was to be inaugurated president of the United States, raising the prospect of a trade war with China, and on the same day that Prime Minister Theresa May of Britain outlined plans to pursue her country’s departure from the European Union.
The Chinese leader used his moment to make an expansive case for globalization as a source of prosperity. He never mentioned Trump by name, nor did he even make reference to the fact that the White House is about to gain a new occupant. Yet, his speech resonated as a rebuke of the trajectory that the president-elect has promised—not least, his repeated threat of steep tariffs on Chinese goods as a response to what he portrays as predatory trade practices.
“Pursuing protectionism is just like locking oneself in a dark room,” the Chinese president declared. “While wind and rain may be kept outside, so are light and air. No one will emerge as a winner in a trade war.”
In myriad ways, Xi is a strikingly ill-fitting steward of openness and connectivity. Under his direction, China’s Communist Party has clamped down severely on civil society, tightening restrictions on the Internet and jailing scores of lawyers focused on using the country’s own laws to defend the rights of aggrieved people. He has projected China’s navy into contested waters in the South China and East China Seas.
Throughout his speech, Xi carefully used the phrase “economic globalization”, while avoiding unqualified “globalization” reflecting China’s spurning of an open Internet, universal human rights and free elections.
Indeed, the metaphor he used to reject protectionism—“like locking oneself in a dark room”—could just as well have been used to describe China’s political path under his leadership, with the Communist Party overtly guiding a campaign to restrict the influence of what it labels Western notions, such as democracy.
This month China’s top judge delivered a speech sharply criticizing the idea of an independent judiciary, which he said must be “resolutely rejected”.
Not for nothing, China carries a reputation as a country willing to bend the norms of global commerce when such a course suits its interests. Steel producers around the globe complain that Beijing dumps its steel on world markets at prices lower than the cost of raw materials, costing jobs at mills from Italy to Indiana.
But the populist ferment refashioning the global order has made previously unthinkable roles possible. In the United States the supposed citadel of free market enterprise, a wealthy real-estate magnate has captured the White House on the strength of his appeal as a supposed champion of blue-collar workers.
In Davos, where technology executives fret about the plight of sub-Saharan Africa while drinking champagne paid for by investment banks, the chairman of the Communist Party of China—an institution that rules in the name of peasant-led revolution—draped himself in the banner of globalization.
None of these details were featured in Xi’s highly choreographed appearance at the gathering that has become a rite of passage into the ranks of the global elite.
For Klaus Schwab, executive chairman of the WEF, the participation of China’s president amounted to a public-relations coup because it was the first time a Chinese head of state had attended.
Schwab obliged with his trademark soft treatment. He asked no questions, solicited none from the audience, and delivered an introductory address so laudatory that it provoked winces among some in the audience.
“In a world marked by great uncertainty and volatility, the international community is looking to China to continue its responsive and responsible leadership in providing all of us with confidence and stability,” Schwab said.
That Xi chose this year to make his debut underscores China’s attempt to improve its international standing just as much of the world appears in turmoil.
The United States is about to inaugurate as president someone who has questioned the relevance of powerful institutions that have anchored the world order for decades, from North Atlantic Treaty Organization to the World Trade Organization.
Britain is pursuing a fraught divorce from the European Union, dealing a blow to those who have advanced regional integration as a solution to economic and security problems.
The growing electoral strength of populist, anti-European Union parties in France, the Netherlands, Italy and Germany have intensified fears that the union may not endure.
These developments have yielded a gnawing sense that a complex world is suddenly short of adult supervision. Xi devoted his speech to trying to fill that vacuum, casting China as a trustworthy power in which serious-minded people are taking considered action to address consequential challenges—from climate change to a weak global economy.
“This appears to be a time of uncertainty in the United States, in the UK,” said Kai-Fu Lee, a prominent venture capitalist in Beijing who invests in emerging Chinese companies. “The world needs strong leaders to give the world confidence.”
In keeping with the traditions of speeches delivered by senior Chinese officials, Xi’s address was long on platitudes, tortured metaphors and literary references, while nearly bereft of policy pronouncements.
Yet, in totality, it delivered a striking message: In an era in which the United States and Britain are consumed with recriminations over the strains of globalization, China will continue to tether its fortunes to world trade.
Image credits: AP/Michel Euler