|
TO many
children, Elmo, the much-loved furry red monster from
Sesame Street, is more than just a plaything. To children
ages two to five years old, Elmo is a trusty playmate—a
friend to lug around the playground; one who won’t
complain when hugged, pinched or smothered with kisses.
For parents, Elmo even makes a good teacher. How many
children from all over the world have learned the letters
of the alphabet or mastered numbers one to 10 from this
ticklish little creature? Children eat orange and broccoli
because Elmo does, too.
Imagine
parents’ shock, then, when Mattel announced a massive
global recall of toys in August this year that included
Elmo, Big Bird and Dora the Explorer toys, among others.
On August 1, Mattel’s Fisher-Price division announced that
it was recalling 1.5 million preschool toys because of
lead paint. That action included 967,000 toys sold in the
United States between May and August.

Two weeks
later, it announced that it would be recalling 19 million
toys worldwide, mainly Chinese-made toys that either had
excessive amounts of lead paint or had small magnets that
could easily be swallowed by children. It announced that
further recalls could follow, as it began investigations
and production checks in its factories in
China.
Toy
recalls are nothing new in America. For the past two
decades, monthly recalls have been issued covering all
kinds of toys and children’s equipment for an assortment
of reasons—high lead content, having loose buttons or
small parts that can come off, being made without fire
retardants, among others. Almost every toy brand has
experienced having its items pulled off the shelves for
reasons that Filipinos typically do not worry about, but
which American consumers have been trained to regard as a
possible health hazard. The average Filipino consumer, for
instance, would not worry about a teddy bear with loose
button for eyes, or fret over drawstrings longer than 2
inches on a toddler’s shirt. American regulators, though,
would see those loose buttons as a possible choking
hazard, and the drawstrings as a possible strangulation
threat.
High lead
content, ingestion of which can lead to developmental
delays and learning difficulties, is the top reason why
toys are pulled off the shelves. American consumers are,
in fact, relatively well informed in matters involving
product recalls, and trooping to the store to return a
crib or a doll that fails product safety standards is
almost a nonevent for many. US retailers, for that matter,
do not question a customer who walks in to return or
exchange a toy for whatever reason. Tired of Piglet?
Here’s Pooh Bear instead.
The August
toy recalls, though, were troubling for their scale. Never
before have parents seen so many of the children’s
best-loved toys being labeled as a health hazard. For
many, it was agonizing to think that those Elmo stacking
rings their babies have mouthed with aplomb actually
contained dangerous levels of lead. Even before trade
officials could get moving, parents all over the world
were already emptying their children’s toy boxes to flush
out the toys they deemed to be everything but dangerous.
The recall scare did not spare the
Philippines,
especially affecting those parents who normally pick up
toys in their travels to the United States. The response,
though, was more subdued than the frenzy experienced in
other countries.
Unlike the
full-blown recall carried out in the United States, the
Philippine recall was much more limited in scale.
Fortunately for Mattel’s toy distributors in the
Philippines, Richwell Trading and Ban Kee Corp., the toy
stocks in their warehouses were not among the flagged
toys.
According
to a Mattel press statement, the Philippine recall was
limited to three main lines, including 16 lines of Polly
Pocket toys with magnets made in 2006 and earlier (Pollyworld
Dial a Style; Polly World Rocking Theme Park set, Quick
Click Playset, Quick Click Penthouse, Quick Click
Boutique, among others.); Magna Battle Armor, Batman and
Fight Wing Batman Magnet Lok system figures; as well as
Sarge die-cast cars from Disney/Pixar. The recall
announcement was made through print ads in major Filipino
dailies as well as through notices in the customer service
counters of major toy retailers.
Of course,
there were many questions raised, especially among those
who had purchased some of the recalled toys in the United
States. Filipinos taking to the net were also surprised to
find some of their old toys on the recall lists of the
past years, and could only shake their heads in dismay.
But unlike
American parents who frantically pulled out the toys from
their children’s toy boxes, Filipino parents, after their
initial shock, were far more relaxed about the whole
recall to-do.
Perceptions Inc., a public relations firm tasked to handle
the Mattel recall hotline in the
Philippines, was
initially deluged by calls from worried consumers but the
tumult soon petered out. Rhea Bautista of Perceptions
reports that out of more than 100 calls made to the Mattel
hotline since August, less than half of the callers have
followed through on their complaint. In fact, the
on-ground team has been busy following up these callers,
but many are no longer keen on following up on their
complaint, even if the toys can be picked up by courier. “Di
bale na lang [Never mind],” was a common refrain.
Bautista
notes that there have been zero returns for the Batman
figures, and negligible figures for the Barbie kitchen and
living room sets. The most returns were for Polly Pocket
dolls, whose magnets were found to easily detach from the
toys and which could cause a choking hazard if swallowed.
Majority
of the callers, she notes, came from the upper
socioeconomic classes, which is not surprising considering
that toys made by Mattel are priced above the reach of the
mass market. Whether Filipino parents simply do not give
much weight to the hazards of lead ingestion, belittle the
possible dangers posed by these toys in their bedrooms, or
are inured to having the developed world dumping toxic
products in their children’s bedrooms, is something that
only they can determine.
One theory
also holds that most Filipino children are constantly
watched by adults—nannies, their moms, aunts, grandparents
or some relative in an extended household—so that the list
of an unsupervised toddler ingesting some harmful product
is not so high, and therefore, parents aren’t so paranoid
about the potential harm from toys.
Bautista
points out that it is far easier to exchange or return
recalled toys through the Mattel hotline. Unlike retailers
who still require the official receipt, and sometimes even
the original packaging of the toys, Mattel is ready to
pick up any toy that bears the right product code or at
least fits the description of the toy in question.
Bautista adds that even toys bought in other countries,
including the Dora and the Sesame Street line, are now
being received and processed through the Philippine
hotline.
Of course,
returning toys has not always been this easy in the
Philippines. The first wave of recalls, which covered the
Dora the Explorer line, had to be processed through
Mattel’s Malaysia office. A parent who tried to return her
daughter’s Dora toy found it simpler to dump the toy in
the trash bin instead.
Today,
Mattel’s Southeast Asia office in Malaysia still oversees
recall operations in the Philippines, which will run up to
February 2008. The Department of Health is the government
agency closely monitoring the pullouts, while the
Department of Trade and Industry is simply assisting the
involved retailers.
DTI
Undersecretary Zeny Maglaya notes that Mattel “pulled out
quickly” following the recall announcements. Toy
manufacturers and importers, on the other hand, are
voluntarily seeking and presenting laboratory results
attesting to the safety of their toys, especially those
toys that are being packaged with kiddie meals by
fast-food chains.
Last
November, the DOH issued a circular requiring importers
and manufacturers to present their laboratory results to
the DOH-attached Bureau of Technology and Health Devices
following a six-month transition phase, during which
consultations will be made.
In the
meantime, the public could only hope that toy
manufacturers and government agencies could at least
conduct independent audits at different points of the
supply chain, whether it be at the manufacturing, shipping
or retail levels. Third-party laboratories and testing
facilities should also be identified. Filipino retailers
could undertake their own safety checks on toys, similar
to what retailer SM did for the Christmas lights sold in
its stores. Product registration cards should also be
included in toy products to ensure the success of future
recalls.
Maglaya
believes the recall wave has made Filipino consumers more
aware of the need to ensure product safety and quality.
“The China recalls was a wake-up call. More calls were
made to our consumer direct line,” she added. That, she
says, is a “good sign” which means that no matter how
slow, Filipinos are somehow on the road to consumer
vigilance. |