HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • Scheme to give OFWs fixed-rate
    exchange still iffy
    By Jun Vallecera
    Reporter

    STATE-OWNED Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP) still has doubts on the planned mechanism aiming to lock the exchange rate the bank offers as a service to the overseas-working Filipino community and blunt the impact of the strong peso.

    The proposal originated from Overseas Workers’ Welfare Administration (OWWA) chief Marianito Roque and resulted from his dialogue with Sen. Mar Roxas II and with Malacañang.

    According to DBP president Rey G. David, the bank is studying a number of mechanisms under which the impact of the strong peso on the spending power of OFW families may be enhanced given the steady deterioration of the US dollar.

    “We are looking at models that would achieve the same effect,” David said in a telephone interview.

    David was apparently being cautious about the plan considering the implications, such as which entity would shoulder what would obviously be some subsidy requirement in order to sustain that kind of arrangement. The OWWA-endorsed plan had originated from a senatorial call for the government to do something concrete to ease the plight of OFW families and of the export sector.

    The OWWA proposal entails costs that no one at this point is certain about, such as who should shoulder costs that DBP, as a state-owned bank, is prohibited from subsidizing.

    Under the Owwa model, DBP would enroll qualified OFWs in a program where the peso value of their foreign currency earnings would be fixed at given rate for up to a year.

    In this way, beneficiary OFW families would be assured of a fixed peso equivalent to their dollar earnings. Theoretically, the upside for DBP is that the remitters are locked into the bank for a year, but no one in the government has apparently done the math to see whether the benefits of having a certain number of locked-in workers for a year would compensate for the costs of keeping the exchange rate fixed for them.

    What Roque forgot to account for, however, was the identity of who eventually shoulders the differential as the exchange rate improves over time.

    That is a cost that no one right now knows for certain anybody was willing to underwrite, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas said in reaction.

    “This can be achieved by using a hedging facility,” BSP Governor Amando M. Tetangco Jr. said in a text message.

    Hedging as an exporter tool is already available at the DBP, albeit volumes that do not impress many banks.

    It works by fixing the future earnings of exporters to a preagreed rate for a fee, shielding them from exchange rate losses as the peso improves relative the US dollar.

    Deputy BSP governor Diwa C. Guinigundo said the OWWA and the DBP have to flesh out their plans so that the issue of subsidizing one sector over another becomes clear.

    Subsidies, as a whole, are against existing policy.

    OTHER STORIES

    P30-B asset sale eyed in 2008


    ADB ups RP GDP growth forecast to 7%


    JCPC limits room for Transco play


    Solons insist: Government must keep PNOC-EDC


    Filibustering on cheap-drugs bill assailed


    Scheme to give OFWs fixed-rate exchange still iffy


    Peso rises to 7 1/2-yr high


    Pinay is second RP fatality in terror attacks vs UN


    Vietnam close to overtaking RP in shipping–UN