|
The
clock is ticking toward 2015 when the country will be
held to account for its commitments to the Millennium
Development Goals, or the MDGs.
The
United Nations web site explains in hopeful language
that “the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)—which
range from halving extreme poverty to halting the spread
of HIV/AIDS and providing universal primary education,
all by the target date of 2015—form a blueprint agreed
to by all the world’s countries and the entire world’s
leading development institutions. They have galvanized
unprecedented efforts to meet the needs of the world’s
poorest.”
In the
case of the
Philippines,
the poverty- reduction component of the MDG translates
to halving the poverty incidence of 45.3 percent in 1991
to 22.65 percent by 2015. This seems like an impressive
improvement goal since we were already at 30 percent in
2003—until one realizes that Thailand had already halved
its poverty incidence from 27 percent in 1991 to 9.8
percent in 2002!
Still,
our government and non-government organizations have
been slowly but surely lining up to work on the
country’s MDGs. Not to be outdone in the MDG-related
scramble to do good for the country are many of the most
prominent business organizations that comprise the
Philippine Business for Social Progress (PBSP).
The
concern for the MDGs from the business sector, in
general, and for poverty reduction, in particular, is
very welcome indeed, especially since the sector has
been doing quite well. Financial indicators from the
corporate sector of the country have been impressive in
recent years. BizNews Asia reported that the 10 most
profitable corporations of 2005 together netted P219
billion compared to P86 billion in 2004—an increase of
more than 150 percent. The Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE)
reports that the stock-market return last year as
measured by the PSEi was higher than 40 percent, an
impressive increase from the 30 percent the index
registered in 2000. The PSE also reports that total
market capitalization has grown from almost P3 trillion
in 2000 to more than P7 trillion by the end of 2006.
Despite
the financial gains in the business sector, however, the
sector’s growth has not been inclusive. The gains have
not led to an increase in the general welfare. The
sobering truth is that the average family income has
been declining in real terms. The Family Income and
Expenditure Survey (FIES) reports that average real
family income dropped from P148,000 in 2003 to P144, 000
in 2006. The Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE)
continues to report widespread violations of labor laws
by companies, ranging from nonprovision of social
benefits to illegitimate subcontracting.
As part
of the MDG program, Corazon Urquico of the United
Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Philippines Country
Office recently announced the agency’s advocacy for more
socially inclusive economic growth activities. A UNDP
document provided by Ms. Urquico explained, among other
things, that “while economic growth is essential to
human progress, it is not sufficient for achieving the
MDGs”. The document expressed the agency’s commitment to
support the country in “accelerating inclusive growth to
ensure equitable, broad-based human development” and in
the process “build the necessary (and often absent)
‘bridges’ between the gross domestic product/financial
accounting approach and the wider, deeper human
development approach.”
In 2005
business organizations, through the PBSP, committed P3.2
billion for the period 2004-2009 for MDG-related
programs, which would address poverty reduction, small-
and medium-enterprise development, basic education,
water and health. While this is a substantial
commitment, I note that most of the envisioned programs
target realities external to the business organizations
themselves, such as community outreach and support for
enterprise creation. I hope that PBSP can also show
leadership in making business more inclusive by
encouraging its member-companies to ensure greater
direct benefits to employees from the gains of business
growth.
I would
like to see PBSP, for example, lead the way in
protecting the rights of employees to a voice in company
affairs through unions. It’s a public secret that a
number of large companies actively discourage the
formation of unions. I cannot imagine business ever
being inclusive while managers continue to exclude
employees from the discussion of important issues
affecting their welfare.
Another
inclusive practice I’d like to see more of are employee
stock-ownership programs such as that of Manila Water.
Profit-sharing, as practiced by the San Jose Kitchen
Cabinets, for instance, is also consistent with the
right of employees to a just share of the fruits of
business activity—a right that is enshrined in the
Constitution.
In the
end, the emphasis on inclusive business is nothing new.
It is just a return to the all-important need to link
economic activity to the fulfillment of basic human
rights. Business organizations are social institutions,
after all, and must ultimately be judged by how they
promote human rights and total human development.
Dr. Ben Teehankee is associate professor of corporate
social responsibility and governance at the Ramon V. del
Rosario Graduate School of Business of De La Salle
Professional Schools. He may be e-mailed at teehankeeb@yahoo.com. |