HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  

    Editorials:

    Illustration by Jimbo Albano

    Multisectoral approach needed vs corruption

    What’s the obvious conclusion when the Philippines keeps turning up on the list of the world’s most corrupt nations and the government keeps on saying that this isn’t true, that it is doing everything possible to minimize, if not eradicate, it?

    On the one hand, that government is either not telling the truth, or that it is so hopelessly inept that it cannot seem to monitor corruption taking place right under its very nose. 

    And, on the other, that the institution that conducts the survey on worldwide corruption is itself not credible, or worse, deliberately twisting the facts to suit its own prejudices and biases. 

    Which would you believe if, for the nth time, the Philippines finds itself on the roster of countries where corruption is widespread?  

    The Philippines ranks No. 10 on that list of countries, behind Albania, Cambodia, Cameroon, Macedonia, Kosovo, Nigeria, Pakistan, Romania and Senegal, where petty bribery is highest, according to the latest survey of Transparency International (TI). More than 33 percent of the respondents in these countries claimed they paid a bribe to obtain a service.

    TI noted that the police as an institution was the most affected by petty bribery, followed by the judiciary and City Hall, where registry and permits are issued. The poll also showed that “the general public believe political parties, parliament, the police and the judicial/legal system are the most corrupt institutions in their societies.”

    The survey, likewise, showed a high level of pessimism on the part of Filipinos on the government’s capability to fight corruption. The Philippines is ranked along with India, Senegal, South Africa, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom where more than 70 percent of the respondents expect the level of corruption to increase over the next three years.

    Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer, begun in 2003, evaluates the sentiments of ordinary people on the impact of corruption. The barometer “explores how corruption affects the daily lives of ordinary citizens, asking about the general public’s attitudes toward corruption, the extent to which they believe corruption pervades public institutions, their experience with petty bribery, and their sense of how the fight against corruption will fare in the future.”

    And if there’s any doubt about the validity of the findings, the survey was conducted by the respected polling firm Gallup International with a standard margin of error of +/- 4.

    So what has been the Arroyo administration’s response to the latest TI survey showing the country as among the most corrupt in the world?

    President Arroyo has said on numerous occasions that the administration is exerting all efforts to eliminate corruption within the bureaucracy. She says her administration aims “to stamp out corruption and set a new standard of governance for our nation” because “corruption saps the lifeblood out of our political system.” 

    Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita said the administration is aware of these surveys and has always taken measures to improve the government’s standings in the polls.

    In fact, on the occasion of the observance yesterday, December 9, of International Anticorruption Day, Foreign Affairs Secretary Alberto Romulo reaffirmed the Philippine government’s commitment “as a state party to faithfully implement the provisions of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption [UNCAC].” The UNCAC, which came into effect in December 2005, represents a universally accepted comprehensive platform for fighting corruption, and is the first legally binding international anticorruption instrument.

    But has the Philippine government made significant headway in reducing corruption and in bringing grafters to the bar of justice?

    From where we stand, the reality on the ground stands at loggerheads with the official rhetoric, and a substantial part of the national budget—up to a fourth, according to the World Bank—continues to end up in private pockets. The opposition has compiled a long list of alleged corrupt deals under the Arroyo administration, yet, it doesn’t look like the Office of the Ombudsman or the Presidential Antigraft Commission are in a real hurry to get to the bottom of the shenanigans and to bring the malefactors to justice. 

    Corruption takes many forms, from petty bribery to plunder. We completely agree with the view of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime that “each act of corruption contributes to global poverty, obstructs development and drives away investment.”

    It is true that the damage caused by corruption cannot be merely measured in economic terms, as it also debilitates judicial and political systems, weakens the rule of law and erodes trust in government institutions. That’s why we fully support a broad approach in curbing corruption anchored on complementary efforts by the government, the private sector and civil society. Nothing less will do if we hope to sustain economic growth and achieve lasting political stability.

    OTHER STORIES
    Editorial: Multisectoral approach needed vs corruption

    What’s the obvious conclusion when the Philippines keeps turning up on the list of the world’s most corrupt nations and the government keeps on saying that this isn’t true, that it is doing everything possible to minimize, if not eradicate, it?

    read more

    Caroline Baum: ‘Uncertainty’ just another word for lots to lose

    Central bankers loathe uncertainty.

    And they aren’t the only ones. Stock-market investors, business owners, statisticians, housewives on a budget, job seekers: all of us hate not knowing what the future holds.

    read more

    Dean de la Paz: Reforming agrarian reform

    Coming from two decades of martial rule where a military-backed despot and an oligarchy of cronies wantonly plundered, leaving to Corazon Aquino an economy virtually bankrupt, one of the last receptacles of hope was a centerpiece statute whose vision was the emancipation of the destitute and the dream of infusing social justice into an inequitable agricultural society.

    read more

    Coast-to-Coast: The other side of aid

    World Bank president Robert Zoellick has been quoted as being “hopeful” that the 40 biggest donors to the bank’s International Development Assistance (IDA) Fund, its lending arm for development projects in the world’s impoverished countries, will increase their subscriptions at the final pledging session in Berlin next week to ensure that assistance to these countries will not be undermined much less diminished. 

    read more

    The Entrepreneur: We should be doing 8 percent

    PERHAPS I should title this column “Why we’re not doing 8 percent.” I’m referring to our economic growth as measured in terms of gross domestic product, or GDP.

    read more

    Ambassador Alistair MacDonald: Climate change and EU’s response

    The European Union believes that the UN Climate Change conference from December 3 to 14 in Bali, Indonesia, must agree to launch negotiations on a comprehensive and ambitious global climate-change agreement for the period after 2012, when the Kyoto Protocol’s first commitment period ends.

    read more