|
THE
Commission on Elections (Comelec) still has over two
years before the next electoral exercise, but it should
now start cleansing the padded voters’ list of at least
two million double registrations, according to Sen.
Loren Legarda.
“There
should be no excuses why the voters’ list can’t be
purged of these double registrations,” she said after
noting that a Comelec official recently admitted that
the poll body was having difficulty correcting the
double listings.
In a
statement, Legarda asserted that ensuring the integrity
of the voters’ list is the first step toward ensuring
the credibility of elections. “All other measures to
foil attempts at poll fraud will be for naught if the
voters’ list is tainted with double registrations,
especially if they number around two million.”
Recalling her unfortunate experience where she protested
the result of the 2004 vice presidential election before
the Presidential Electoral Tribunal, Legarda noted that
elections at the national level are often decided by
only hundreds of thousands of votes.
“Two
million double registrations can translate to two
million spurious votes,” she added. “While most double
registrations may have been done without malice when
voters changed residences, the double listings would
provide an avenue to cheat.”
She
warned that “with a padded voters’ list, unscrupulous
election officers will have votes to sell to the highest
bidders or, at the very least, leave the door wide open
for flying voters.”
Legarda
insisted that the Comelec must purge double
registrations, whether by filing individual exclusion
petitions in courts or by any other legal means that
would cleanse the voters’ list without disfranchising
voters.
But the
Comelec director for the National Capital Region (NCR),
Ferdinand Rafanan, admitted that the poll body does not
have enough manpower to file and attend hearings for
exclusion petitions. He said the second option, for
Comelec to issue a blanket cancellation of the “second
and subsequent registrations,” may impede a citizen’s
right to vote, thus the need for case-to-case petitions.
Legarda
cautioned, however, that even if a blanket cancellation
by the Comelec has basis, the paramount concern with
such a move is the possible disfranchisement of voters.
This was
why she suggested that with two-and-a-half years left
before the next election, “the Comelec should at least
try to file the petitions instead of saying it can’t be
done.” A blanket Comelec cancellation of second or
subsequent registrations would effectively disfranchise
voters who changed residences, though it may weed out
flying voters, she pointed out. |