|
The late
Manila Standard columnist and senior pundit Louis
Beltran, may he rest in peace, would have had a field
day over the events of last Thursday.
Mr.
Beltran never tired of calling the Philippines a “banana
republic” based on some of the foolishness that occurred
during the Aquino administration. Mr. Beltran always
couched his “banana republic” comments in a sly humor
that was not disrespectful to the nation but with an
understanding of how absurd things sometimes were here.
And it will take a lot to beat the absurdity of
Thursday’s debacle.
From the
conversations I had during that fateful afternoon, I
think many businesspeople would have gladly bought
raffle tickets to be the first to tell the occupiers of
the Manila Pen hotel how angry they were at what
happened.
The
reason I mention the attitude of the businessmen and
women is that they seem to be the only group that looked
at the bigger picture and may be the only ones who fully
comprehend how everything is interconnected. Allow me to
share an example.
In a
editorial over the weekend, one newspaper wrote the
completely false and ridiculous idea that the stock
market was not really affected since it closed higher
for the day. Excuse me! The market was up 100 points
when the situation started, and 30 minutes later was
only up 15 points, closing the day up less than 30
points.
Even as
of yesterday’s close, prices have not recovered to
pre-Manila Pen levels. Obviously, the editorial author
wanted to make a point and used only the closing prices
to justify his or her point, ignoring or ignorant of
what really happened.
The
government wanted to look and act decisive and in
control. The military wanted to leave the impression
that they were strong and could adequately handle the
situation. The occupiers of the hotel had their own
agenda. The press wanted to look competent and
objective. Although all participants would certainly
shout loud and long that they were doing their job to
protect the best interests of the country, it is more
probable that they all were only protecting their own
best interests. Something about the road to hell being
paved with good intentions comes to mind.
The
complaint of rampant corruption in the Philippines and
how something should be done about it is an argument
that sounds so sweet and sincere on the surface that it
is hard to respond to. I mean, who wants corruption in
any level or sector of society? And the argument is
always made that corruption in the highest levels of
society is responsible for others in the society also
being corrupt. Again, it sounds like it makes sense, but
does it?
For
example, in most wealthier countries, police corruption
is very small. Is it because the highest government
officials lead by example? The South Koreans would
disagree on that point. In the US, police corruption
most often occurs in the antinarcotics units. Surrounded
by all the money from illegal-drugs operations, these
cops are tempted and often succumb to that temptation.
But try
to bribe a police officer from a traffic ticket, and you
will probably go to jail. It is just not worth it to him
or her to jeopardize a career for a few hundred dollars.
And it is not worth the traffic offender paying more to
get out of the ticket.
Here in
the Philippines, a P500 bribe to avoid a P1,500
illegal-parking fine is worth it to the offender, and
the extra P500 may be worth it to the policeman. Is it a
matter of corruption or simply a matter of “good”
business sense by both parties?
While
the major players in Thursday’s affair might plead their
case by claiming they are in the battle against
corruption, by not looking at the bigger picture they
may have contributed to Filipino corruption.
Many
businesses in the local area were closed owing to what
happened. There were probably dozens of hotel-service
employees and restaurant workers who were cheated out of
some of their wages that day.
This may
seem a silly example, but go with me on it. I am sure
that there was at least one bellhop or waiter at the
hotel Thursday that did not make that extra P200 or P300
in tips he expected. Maybe because of that income
shortfall, they had to use the “5/6” man, or worse,
resorted to more serious forms of illegality or
“corruption.”
Boo
Chanco of Philippine Star maybe said it best:
“Hopefully, everyone learned a good lesson with last
Thursday’s event.” Unity is not about getting along; it
is about working together toward a common goal, and I do
not see anyone on Thursday meeting that objective.
E-mail comments to mangun@email.com. |