|
THE
Sandiganbayan’s Fifth Division told the Presidential
Commission on Good Government (PCGG) to terminate the
presentation of witnesses as it finally took cognizance
of the protracted proceedings in the Lucio Tan case.
“You
should complete the testimonies of your witnesses. You
should endeavor and try your best to terminate their
testimonies if they have nothing more to say,” Associate
Justice Maria Cristina Cortez Estrada, chairman of the
antigraft court’s Fifth Division, told PCGG lawyer
Catalino Generillo Jr. on Wednesday after he informed
the court he has no witness to present.
Estrada
cited government witnesses like former PCGG chairman
Jovito Salonga, Kilusang Bagong Lipunan Rep. Ferdinand
Marcos Jr. of Ilocos Norte and director Jeremy Barns of
the Malacańang Museum, who all began but have not
completed their respective testimonies.
She
directed Generillo to be ready with his witnesses when
the court resumes hearings on Civil Case 005 in January
next year.
Earlier,
defense lawyers expressed frustration over the PCGG’s
repeated failure to present its witnesses to fast-track
the proceedings. Since there was no government witness
available, the court decided to reschedule the hearings
for next year.
Tan’s
lead defense counsel Estelito Mendoza has been
complaining that PCGG was allegedly “taking its sweet
time” in presenting evidence and witnesses. He has
appealed to Sandiganbayan justices to compel PCGG to
finally terminate the testimonies of its witnesses,
citing his client’s right to speedy trial.
Often,
Mendoza complained, PCGG witnesses were either
unprepared or brought documents that were unnecessary or
irrelevant to the case. “That is the story over and over
again,” he said, referring to government’s presentation
of unprepared witnesses who have no personal knowledge
of the alleged close links between Tan and the late
dictator Ferdinand Marcos.
He said
the case against Tan should be dismissed for
government’s failure over the past 20 years to present
credible evidence and witnesses that would link his
assets to the alleged ill-gotten wealth of the Marcoses.
Mendoza
pointed out that the appearance of Marcos as a PCGG
“adverse witness” would not help the government’s case
since he [Bongbong] cannot make adverse testimony
against the interest of his father, who is the principal
defendant in Civil Case 005 and other ill-gotten wealth
cases.
The
young Marcos earlier told the court that his father
owned many of Tan's corporations and the latter merely
held the business ventures in trust. Tan's lawyers
however said that the late dictator extorted his shares
of the companies from Tan. |