|
Due to
the number of assessments and tax-audit investigations
being cancelled on account of the taxpayers’ availment
of the tax-amnesty program, the Bureau of Internal
Revenue (BIR) began issuing new letters of authority
(LA) for the examination of taxpayers’ books of accounts
and accounting records for the taxable years 2006 and
2007. Thus, it has become necessary for the taxpayers to
review the sufficiency and validity of these LAs to
ensure that these are not issued arbitrarily by the BIR.
An LA is
an official document that empowers a revenue officer to
examine and scrutinize a taxpayer’s books of accounts
and other accounting records in order to determine the
taxpayer’s correct internal-revenue tax liabilities. It
must be served to the concerned taxpayer within 30 days
from the date of its issuance; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. The taxpayer shall then have the
right to refuse being served the LA, unless it is
revalidated.
Who may
issue LAs? After a return has been filed, the BIR
commissioner or his duly authorized representative may
authorize the examination of the books of any taxpayer
and the assessment of the correct amount of tax due from
the taxpayer. A revenue officer is allowed only 120 days
from the date of receipt of the LA by the taxpayer to
conduct the audit and submit the required report of
investigation. If the revenue officer is unable to
submit his final report within the 120-day period, he
must submit a progress report to his head of office and
surrender the LA for revalidation.
LAs are
issued to determine the tax liability of a taxpayer. In
issuing LAs, the following rules must be observed:
first, the LA must contain the correct information about
the taxpayer’s registered name, complete address and
TIN; second, the data regarding the revenue officer/s
authorized to conduct the tax audit as well as the name
of his group supervisor should be properly indicated in
the LA, otherwise, the revenue officers whose names are
not indicated in the LA are considered unauthorized to
conduct the tax audit; and third, the date of its
issuance, the BIR official seal and the scope of the
audit examination must be properly shown on the face of
the LA. The scope of tax audit refers to the kind of
taxes and the corresponding taxable period/s to be
covered by the examination.
In the
case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sony
Philippines Inc. (CTA EB Case No. 90,
May 17, 2007), the examiners were authorized to examine the
taxpayer’s books of accounts and other accounting
records for the period “1997 and unverified prior
years.” The said LA covered the period 1997 and
unverified prior years, but the assessment made on the
deficiency value-added tax (VAT) was for fiscal year
ended
March
31, 1998. The court ruled that the deficiency assessment
issued without a valid authority is a nullity, and the
assessment issued for 1997, using 1998 data, should be
considered without force and effect.
In this
case, the BIR in issuing the LA had full knowledge of
the period of the investigation. Had it wanted to
include the year 1998 or the fiscal year ending in
March 31, 1998, it should have so indicated. And had there been a
mistake in the issuance thereof, the revenue examiners
could have easily asked for the required authorization
from the BIR, instead of conducting an investigation
without proper authority. The fact that the taxpayer was
willing to present documents for the fiscal year that
ended
March
31, 1998, does not cure the invalid act. It should
emanate from the processes provided for by law. The rule
is that a void act cannot be validated or ratified (Sps.
Federico L. Reyes and Maxima Dela Paz, et al., v. Court
of Appeals and The Republic of the Philippines, G.R. No.
94524, September 10, 1998). An illegal act confers no
rights, creates no duties and, in the eyes of the law,
it is as if the same had never existed (Ismael A. Mathay
Jr. v. Victor C. Macalincag, et al., G.R. No. 97618,
December 16,1993).
In
addition, the issuance of LAs for “one taxable year and
all unverified prior years” or similar statements is
prohibited. An LA should cover a taxable period not
exceeding one taxable year. However, if the audit of a
taxpayer shall include more than one taxable period, the
other periods or years shall be specifically indicated
in the LA, or another one covering such period is
required to be issued.
With
these guidelines in mind, taxpayers shall be protected
against the conduct of any unauthorized investigation
and the improper use of LAs by the BIR.
(The
author is an associate of BDB Law. If you have any
comments or questions concerning the article, you can
e-mail the author at pamela.p.palad@bdblaw.com.ph or
call 8562952.) |