|
MR.
Speaker, I urge, nay, I plead with the leadership of the
House not to dignify the Pulido impeachment complaint
with any further formal proceeding.
That
complaint was regarded by all, and we mean all, but one
of its members—to wit, Rep. Egay San Luis—as a total
sham.
This
House had a heyday shredding the Pulido impeachment; so
much so that its sole endorser, Representative San Luis,
all but agreed it was baseless when he asked this
representation and his other interpolators to amend the
impeachment he had endorsed. He had been of the mistaken
view that an impeachment is the same as a congressional
investigation. Representative San Luis admitted that all
he wanted was an honest search for the truth about ZTE.
Not
surprisingly, when the Pulido complaint was referred to
the Committee on Justice, it took just two meetings to
arrive at everyone’s original and immediate conclusion:
it was baseless and empty on its face.
Nonetheless, according to the dominant view, the
referral to the justice committee inoculated the
President from another impeachment within the year. If
the aim of the Pulido complaint was to inoculate the
President, this was achieved by its referral to the
Committee on Justice.
It may
well be that Mr. Pulido has earned his retainer—unless
he prepared his complaint in the same mental obscurity
with which it was subsequently endorsed.
Therefore, there is no need to dignify his baseless
complaint with a further formal proceeding.
It is
argued that a vote by plenary is mandatory by the
constitution. Even when it is a sham and mocks a
constitutional provision for public accountability? Are
we to believe that our constitution makes its own
mockery mandatory? We don’t think so.
But
others may think so. Therefore, I am not asking that a
vote by plenary be ignored; merely that compliance in a
unique case unanimously, and I stress unanimously,
viewed as a sham should come after a decent interval.
Say, one year in the archives.
However,
if this House believes it has no choice on the matter,
then let a shortened version of the justice committee
report that truly reflects the universal view be brought
to it for a vote: one consisting of the single sentence
that, “The Pulido impeachment complaint is hereby
dismissed as a sham.” I believe even the rest of my
friends in the minority will come back to vote for that.
What I
am looking for here, Mr. Speaker, is for a way, any way,
for this House to escape the indignity of performing the
most dignified rites over a mockery of its sole
prerogative to impeach under the constitution.
Please,
honorable sirs, do not treat the members of this House
as comfort women. Do not pile on the injury of a
constitutional rape, the indignity of having the House
do a striptease for Mr. Pulido and whoever else cooked
up this abomination.
If the
House leadership insists on embarrassing the House
members with a formal vote, then let this manifestation
serve as the explanation why I don’t want to be part of
the experience. Pretend I was absent. No one wants to be
seen even walking out on a bordello. |