|
FOR many
students, classes in science and math can be a
sleep-inducing experience.
Two
thousand years after Socrates, the traditional lecture
approach where the professor dominates the classroom
discussion is still the standard teaching method of
science in universities.
For
Harvard University Prof. Eric Mazur, this method
encourages memorization rather than solving problems.
Scientific concepts are thus harder for students to
appreciate and apply.
Trading
the physics lab for classrooms, Physics Nobel laureate
Carl Wieman has embarked on a new advocacy to address
this problem and make teaching science more effective to
undergraduate students.
According to Wieman, the standard lecture model is
archaic and goes against how the human brain works. For
him, teaching science should be more interactive, and
modeled to make students think as they learn.
The
Personal Response System (PRS) can be used to make
learning science interactive and interesting. The PRS is
like a TV remote control that each student uses to
transmit individual answers to a computer. This computer
informs the instructor of how many students got the
answer right, and thus allows for a more targeted and
timely instruction.
In
Harvard, Physics Professor Mazur introduced a classroom
approach called peer instruction, where lectures are
interspersed with conceptual questions that students
discuss with each other in small groups. These questions
are called ConcepTests, and develop arguments and ideas
among students.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology is also
implementing a new pedagogical approach in teaching
science. Its Technology-Enabled Active Learning combines
lectures with simulations and hands-on desktop
experiments to provide a collaborative and full learning
experience for students.
These
current efforts at revolutionizing science teaching are
timely. All around the world, students’ interest in
science and technology are dropping. In the Philippines,
enrollment in engineering is only 14 percent of the
total enrollees, while the natural sciences attract a
miniscule 1 percent.
This is
a critical problem because there is a massive global
need for scientists and engineers. They will lead a
country’s technological capacity for innovation, which
will decide whether a country develops or not. |