|
Preventing
theft, damage and errors such as food spoilage has long
been an unyielding and poorly understood problem for
retailers. But a few companies stand out in their ability
to limit losses, and if every retailer were as successful
as they are, the sector could save billions of dollars
annually—as much as $27 billion in the United States
alone.
Despite
growing investment in electronic article surveillance and
other loss-prevention approaches, inventory loss in the
United States has remained stubbornly high over the past
15 years, fluctuating between 1.54 percent and 1.95
percent of sales, according to the University of Florida’s
annual National Retail Security Survey, with the average
rate in 2006 being 1.59 percent. Longer supply chains,
growing product assortments and labor cuts have
contributed to making loss prevention ever more
challenging.
The lesson
of five companies we studied—Target, Limited Brands, Best
Buy, Gap and CVS—isn’t that security people should arrest
more thieves or spend more on technology, the approaches
that have dominated retail loss prevention. While catching
criminals may appeal to the former police officers who are
so often hired to deal with this problem, success requires
a companywide strategy focused on operational excellence.
These companies have shown that demonstrating strong
leadership, embedding effective procedures and ensuring
compliance can drastically limit situations where
shrinkage can occur.
The
companies in our study were recommended by a panel of
specialists on the basis of their innovative approaches
and their success in keeping shrinkage low. The average
shrinkage rate of the five was 44 percent below the US
mean, and one company’s rate was 70 percent below. We
determined that these companies tend to rely on nine
practices in developing an effective approach to loss
prevention.
Three
strategic practices must first be in place:
§
Establish
senior management commitment to making shrinkage a
priority, overseeing an action plan, allocating resources
and monitoring results. (Figures on inventory loss are a
closely guarded secret at most companies, but one of the
five in our study gives shrinkage data to outside
financial analysts so that they can better assess the
company’s performance.)
§
Ensure
organizational commitment from managers throughout the
company; otherwise, any attempted solution will be
short-lived. The loss prevention department’s role is
primarily to lead a cross-functional effort to manage the
problem continuously.
§
Embed loss
prevention at all levels. Employees throughout the company
must take responsibility for reducing shrinkage. The
company should see loss prevention as equal to sales in
importance.
Next the
company must focus on five cultural practices:
§
Provide
strong leadership and develop a team.
Heads of loss prevention must command authority and be
passionate and energetic, and they must create and lead
multifunctional loss prevention teams.
§
Use
evidence-based management.
Decisions must derive from detailed and timely data, not
intuition. (Most of the five companies’ store managers
received item-level shrinkage data every week.)
§
Innovate
and experiment.
Team members must listen and have open minds so that they
can stay ahead of such new challenges as self-checkout
scanning equipment.
§
Talk
shrinkage.
Companies can help keep shrinkage on the agenda by, for
example, providing regular shrinkage scorecards.
§
Prioritize
procedural control.
All parts of the company must see the link between
shrinkage and poor adherence to process. Checking the
accuracy of stock deliveries should be viewed as on a par
with catching thieves.
Traditionally, a store’s operational staff has been the
starting point for controlling shrinkage, but for these
retailers it was the final piece of the puzzle. Thus the
ninth, operational excellence practice: Empower store
workers and hold them accountable. Store managers and
front-line workers should be asked for their views as the
shrinkage-prevention plan is being developed and then
given the necessary tools, training and data to implement
the plan. (One of the companies we studied goes a step
further, giving store associates a share of any savings in
shrinkage beyond the store’s agreed-upon target.)
Inventory
loss has always been regarded as an unavoidable
consequence of doing business, but these five companies
have shown that by adopting a proactive and integrative
approach, a firm can successfully reduce shrinkage’s drain
on profitability, thereby increasing shopper and
shareholder value. |