|
Does your
company’s executive team struggle with chronic
communication problems and a lack of shared
accountability? Many times when my colleagues and I are
called in to help out an organization, we find that these
two core issues underlie their problems.
Two
qualities characterize high-functioning leadership teams:
1) Hard conversations happen and 2) accountability is
shared—individuals on the top team feel a responsibility
to the organization as a whole, not just for their piece
of the action.
To take
senior teams to a new level of leadership, we have put
together a model of communication that we call The Morning
Meeting (TMM).
What TMM
looks like
Here’s how
TMM in its purest form works: Every day, at the same time,
the top team—numbering between six and 15 people, both
staff and line—assembles around a conference table, either
in person or virtually. Also at the table are one or two
others who either are responsible for an important current
initiative or are valued for their area of expertise.
There’s no
preset agenda. While the CEO sits at the head of the
table, if there is such a spot, he does not run the
meeting, and everyone sits in the same place each day.
Around the conference table on folding chairs, in a sort
of gallery, are a handful of deputies and executive
assistants.
Sometimes
the CEO will have an issue or two to begin the meeting.
More often, the CEO defers to the person seated to his
left, the No. 2 person—the chief of staff, deputy CEO, or
chief operating officer—who starts things off and runs the
meeting. When No. 2’s issues are fully discussed, the
person seated to the left of No. 2 raises any issues of
concern, and so on, moving clockwise around the table.
Once
everyone at the table has had an opportunity to speak,
everyone in the gallery leaves and the top team members
get a chance to go around the table again. In this second
phase of the meeting, executives discuss issues that
demand a higher level of confidentiality. The entire
meeting can take as little as 15 minutes or as long as two
hours.
The ground
rules
§
Anyone can
put anything on the table for discussion; it doesn’t have
to be related to one’s own area of responsibility. All are
expected to be willing to comment on every issue raised,
even those that lie beyond their technical expertise or
area of responsibility.
§
These are
decision meetings, but issues are not just raised and
resolved. Implementation plans are broadly outlined and
agreed on, and internal and external communication
strategies may be considered. Sometimes, with particularly
sensitive issues, the exact language that everyone around
the table is going to use is hammered out.
§
Once an
issue is fully vetted, the CEO determines the rule that
will govern it. He decides whether he’ll be the one to
make the final call, whether a particular individual or
subgroup will make it or whether it will be made by group
consensus.
§
Changing
one’s mind, even in the middle of the conversation, is OK,
even respected. Not having an opinion is not.
§
There are
no arguments about factual questions. Participants are to
get the facts and raise the subject at the next meeting.
Keep in
mind, however, that fact questions are sometimes masks for
deeper value-laden issues. An argument about the cost of
opening a remote office might mask strategic concerns
about whether expansion is a good idea.
Making it
work in your organization
The TMM
model is a flexible one. During a crisis or during
organization-wide change initiatives, we advise holding
the meeting daily. When things are running smoothly,
meeting less frequently can deliver positive results.
Division and unit heads can adapt the model to foster
better decision-making and execution within their teams.
On the
surface, TMM is about communication, but embedded within
it are norms and values critical for organizations that
must adapt nimbly to new situations: an openness to
considering multiple perspectives, a willingness to share
responsibility for finding creative solutions and the
discipline to move consistently from strategy to
execution.
THE PAYOFFS
Here are
some of the most significant benefits that Cambridge
Leadership Associates has seen in organizations that have
adopted some version of The Morning Meeting:
§
Backbiting, intrateam conflicts, turf protection and
second-guessing are dramatically reduced. Everyone owns
every decision made in the meeting.
§
Competition for face time with the CEO goes away.
§
“Crises”
can be addressed with detachment. When a vice president
rushes into the CEO’s office looking for help with a
decision during a crisis, the CEO can say, “Bring it up at
the meeting tomorrow” or “OK, let’s get the group together
now.”
§
Team
members feel a responsibility for the organization as a
whole. Any problem that one team member has becomes a team
problem, and thereby everyone benefits from the experience
and insight of the entire team.
§
Miscommunication is minimized. Everyone is quickly and
clearly on the same page.
§
Difficult
conversations are the norm, and tough issues do not fester
until they explode but are addressed while they are still
manageable.
§
People and
issues can no longer hide.
§
Top team
members do their homework better. When “you stay off my
turf and I’ll stay off yours” rules apply, executives
often feel their obligation ends with providing
information. But when group accountability is the norm,
executives are motivated to prepare more fully for
discussions of business challenges. |