|
THE
lawyer of a business tycoon has chided the Presidential
Commission on Good Government (PCGG) for its failure to
bring to the Sandiganbyan the son of the late dictator,
who promised to present and testify on original
documents purportedly showing that his late father,
former President Ferdinand Marcos, owns 60 percent of
nine of Lucio Tan’s companies.
“[Kilusang Bagong Lipunan] Rep. Ferdinand Marcos [Jr.
of Ilocos Norte] was again a ‘no-show.’ Neither has the
PCGG presented the original documents that would
allegedly prove that Mr. Tan and the former President
are business partners. The Sandiganbayan should not
allow defendants in this case to be ‘hostaged’ by the
PCGG’s inability to present its witnesses. We cannot
wait forever,” lawyer Estelito Mendoza said.
At the
same time,
Mendoza pleaded to the justices of the Sandiganbayan’s Fifth
Division to issue a definitive ruling on the relevance
and materiality of the evidence being presented by the
PCGG. He said the supposed letters of his client (Tan)
to former President Ferdinand Marcos do not show that
Tan acquired his property or shares of stocks using
government resources. The documents which were
subpoenaed by the PCGG from the
Malacańang Museum included letters of Tan to the former
President allegedly seeking favors.
“As
everybody knows, President Marcos at that time possessed
both executive and legislative powers. It was but normal
for a person like Mr. Tan to seek his intercession if
this would help his business or expedite government
action on certain matters. However, these letters would
only be relevant to this case if it would relate to the
properties involved in this ill-gotten-wealth case,”
Mendoza said.
Tan’s
counsel also criticized the PCGG’s “turtle-paced”
presentation of evidence, saying at the rate PCGG’s
lawyers were going with their witness from the
Malacańang Museum, it would take at least three years
before they could finish with one witness.
“This is
exactly what we are saying. Masyado nang matagal ang
kaso. Ang mga abogado at defendants ay nagiging
hostage dahil wala silang kasipagan o due
diligence in preparing their evidence [The case has
dragged on for too long. The lawyers and defendants have
become ‘hostaged’ owing to [PCGG’s] lack of diligence in
preparing their evidence,” he added.
Mendoza
said the PCGG should withdraw the complaint against Tan
because it has failed to present relevant evidence that
would link Tan’s assets to the ill-gotten wealth of the
Marcoses. |