HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • MWSS asks CA to stop QC City Hall
     
    By Joel San Juan
    Reporter

    THE Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) has warned of higher water rates as well as disruption in Metro Manila’s water supply if the Court of Appeals does not enjoin the Quezon City government from auctioning off its real properties and facilities for failure to pay tax dues of P230 million that have accumulated since 1993.

    Government Corporate Counsel Alberto Agra, in last week’s oral arguments at the Court of Appeals, asked the justices of the Special Fifteenth Division to issue a writ of preliminary injunction to indefinitely restrain the Quezon City government from subjecting its properties to a warrant of distraint and levy for the alleged nonpayment of real-property taxes.

    MWSS has jurisdiction, supervision, and control over all waterworks and sewerage systems within Metropolitan Manila, the entire province of Rizal, and a portion of the province of Cavite.

    The properties of MWSS, including its pipelines, reservoirs and aqueducts were supposed to be auctioned off by the Quezon City government on September 27, 2007, but the auction did not push through after the CA issued a 60-day TRO on the same day.

    The TRO will expire on November 26; thus, the MWSS is seeking a writ of preliminary injunction in lieu of the TRO.

    Agra argued the MWSS is a government instrumentality since its real properties and facilities are exclusively devoted for public use and service.

    He said the Quezon City government “arbitrarily and whimsically” classified the MWSS properties comprising of land, machineries and facilities as taxable real properties.

    Agra explained these MWSS properties are being held in trust by MWSS on behalf of or for the benefit of the Republic of the Philippines in accordance with its mandate to generate and provide water supply for Metro Manila and its environs.

    “These MWSS properties were specifically reserved by the State for said purpose. As such, these properties form part of the public domain and consequently exempt from taxation,” he said.

    Under 421 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, the MWSS noted, properties intended for public use such as roads, canals, rivers, torrents, ports and bridges constructed by the State, banks, shores, roadsteads, and others of similar character are considered properties of public dominion.

    The MWSS cited the recent rulings of the Supreme Court in the case of Board of Assessment Appeals, Province of Laguna v. Court of Tax Appeals which held that the water pipes, reservoir, intake and buildings of National Waterworks and Sewerage Authority (Nawasa) (the predecessor of MWSS) being used in the operation of its waterworks system in the municipalities of Cabuyao, Sta. Rosa and Biñan, Province of Laguna are part of public dominion and hence, exempt from real-property taxation.

    Agra said the properties in the Laguna case are similar to the MWSS properties that are subject of the assessment by Quezon City.

    The MWSS also cited the 2007 case of Philippine Fisheries Development Authority v. Court of Appeals, where the Supreme Court ruled the Philippine Fisheries Development Authority is an instrumentality of the national government—thus generally exempt from payment of real-property tax.

    “Thus, the imposition of  real-estate taxes on the petitioner is  effectively a tax on the National Government which shall not only  cause irreparable injury  to the latter but will also work injustice  to the public because such burden will be unduly passed on to  the  water-consuming public by way of exorbitant and unaffordable water rate increase,” said the MWSS.

    Associate Justice Amelita Tolentino, chairman of the Special Fifteenth Division, ordered the parties in the case to submit their respective memoranda within five days, after which the case is deemed submitted for resolution.

    OTHER STORIES

    New rate cuts seen to boost growth


    Fixed exchange rate for RP possible if . . .


    Despite oil, US slowdown fears, WB upbeat


    Four bidders prequalify for Transco


    Yahoo! unveils new info menu for mobile users


    For want of a few millions, air control system loses a radar


    JPE checks debt-payment realignment to projects


    ‘Outrage’ over rape, not poverty, killed Mariannet?


    Maritime students’ assessment urged


    MWSS asks CA to stop QC City Hall


    Ridiculous, baseless, Cuisia says of in-laws’ claim; CA case not final


    BIR reminds firms of Nov. 30 MCIT payment