|
In today’s
densely interconnected workplaces, working with
others—globally and productively—drives organizational and
personal effectiveness. Employees work in teams formed to
tackle projects, in virtual teams with colleagues and
clients, or in ad hoc combinations. Whatever the
provenance of the teams in your workplace, your
organization depends on them.
For five
years I examined collaborative working practices at
companies such as Nokia, Linux, Goldman Sachs and British
Petroleum. I found that while almost all managers and
companies recognize teamwork’s critical value, many
actually encourage behaviors that undermine cooperation.
A gap
exists between the rhetoric of cooperation and the reality
of competition. How can companies close this gap? My
research uncovered four crucial practices:
1. Hire
for cooperation.
Companies in which a cooperative mindset flourishes seek
to attract cooperative people and discourage highly
competitive people. At investment bank Goldman Sachs,
candidates interview with as many as 60 senior members.
Interviews are not about intelligence or focus; they are
simply about whether the candidate’s talent and ambition
are married to a willingness to work collaboratively.
Established and highly profitable, Goldman Sachs has the
resources to engage in multiple interviews and
discussions. But even companies with limited resources can
implement these practices:
§
Review the
competencies used to judge candidates. Do they include
proven abilities to work in teams, deal with conflict and
share knowledge?
§
Involve
collaborative people in the hiring process. (Research
shows that managers are likely to recruit candidates in
their own image.)
§
Present
real-life work scenarios to candidates. Ask them how they
would respond.
2.
Institute onboarding practices that foster collaboration. In the first few weeks after starting a new job or joining a new
company, new employees are particularly sensitive to
cultural and behavioral norms. Implement onboarding
procedures emphasizing collaboration.
In a
newcomer’s first weeks at Finnish mobile phone company
Nokia, for instance, his supervisor introduces him to at
least six members of their team and six people outside
their team.
This
promotes the development of critical working relationships
and encourages people to cooperate both with immediate
colleagues and with those beyond their team.
To
determine what your organization can do in its onboarding
process to encourage collaboration:
§
Think
about the newcomer’s first weeks on the job. Whom should
she meet? Charge someone with the responsibility of
helping her establish those relationships.
§
If a new
hire is expected to work collaboratively, make sure that
those most responsible for onboarding that person
demonstrate cooperativeness.
3. Support
mentoring.
Of all the human-resources practices I studied, the one
most strongly associated with highly cooperative people
and teams was that of mentoring. Mentoring is most
powerful when both parties volunteer for it and when
senior executives are mentors.
To make
mentoring a driver of cooperation in your company:
§
Promote
mentoring and train people to be good mentors, but make
participation of both parties voluntary.
§
Encourage
senior executives to mentor less experienced members of
their team and members of other teams. This sends a strong
message that this capability is valued.
4. Ensure
that performance management rewards collaboration.
For performance management to foster a culture of
cooperation, the process has to be collaborative itself
and measure collaborative behavior. An example is BP’s
Peer Challenge program.
BP’s more
than 100 business units are divided into groups of about
12. Unit heads in each group meet to discuss the previous
assessment period. Those who excelled at meeting a target
share with peers what actions allowed the unit to reach
the goal. They then begin coaching conversations with
colleagues who struggled to meet the same target. Finally,
the business-unit heads in each peer group develop a set
of performance goals for each business unit, which the
unit head then takes to his own boss for approval.
At the end
of the following assessment period, each business unit is
measured according to its performance and that of the
other units in its peer group. What does this accomplish?
Group accountability.
To assess
how well your company’s performance-management process
encourages collaboration, ask yourself:
§
Does the
performance-management process allow peers to discuss
performance and learn from one another, or is it a
hierarchical process?
§
What
follow-up is built into the process? Is this follow-up
collaborative?
§
What
proportion of recognition and reward is doled out for
individual or unit accomplishment, and what proportion is
given over to recognizing and rewarding intraunit team
effort and cross-unit collaboration?
None of these practices is an instant fix.
But together they can turn collaboration into a reality.
Lynda
Gratton is professor of management practice at London
Business School. She is the author, most recently, of Hot
Spots: Why Some Teams, Workplaces and Organizations Buzz
with Energy—and Others Don’t. |