|
There
are stories that simply won’t go away. Like the
Glorietta 2 blast that killed 11 shoppers and passersby,
the ZTE bribery case and, among other controversies, the
“Hello, Garci” tape.
In more
ways than one, they make the foreign business sector
jittery, partly because of the refusal or inability of
people in government to immediately address the issue of
credibility.
Despite
the avowed policy of government and its agencies to make
transparent its dealings with the people, many in the
foreign sector—the natives, it seems, have already given
up—see massive cover-ups and half-truths so much so that
investments from abroad are not as vibrant anymore,
compared with those in neighboring countries such as
Thailand, Indonesia and even China.
The case
of the Glorietta 2 blast tells it all. The police
maintained the blast was the result of a combination of
chemicals and fumes, suggesting that Ayala Corp., the
owner of the mall, was to blame for the unfortunate
incident.
At the
same time, however, the police, also said their findings
were not yet final, indicating that the results of the
investigation were nothing but preliminary. So why did
the police issue the preliminary report? It seems they
just wanted to show that transparency is a sacred
commandment in this corner of the world.
Ayala
Land promptly refuted the police theory, saying the
local and foreign experts it had commissioned attest to
the impossibility of a leak emanating from the basement
of Glorietta 2.
But
Ayala Land was careful not to say the blast was the
handiwork of terrorists.
That the
blast happened just when President Arroyo was being
linked to a scandal where some of her underlings were
accused of giving bribes to governors and congressmen,
allegedly in the hope that they would campaign for a
Charter change, generated a lot of suspicions and fears
that only utmost transparency in the investigation can
allay.
To be
sure, the loose talk that the government or some its
rogue agents had something to do with the blast has, up
to this point, remained just that—loose talk.
Still,
the credibility of the government remains at stake, and
only a credible explanation of the blast can erase
public suspicions. The failure of the majority in the
House of Representatives to make a closure of the Garci
tapes controversy; the unresolved the ZTE bribery case,
and now, the Ayala Land blast, to name a few, speak
volumes, as far as transparency in government is
concerned.
By
refusing to disclose material facts or to allow
government officials to appear in public hearings
suggests that honesty is relative when it comes finding
out the truth, be it the Ayala Land blast or similar
other cases where people want to know more about the
truth.
Jaime
Ayala, president and chief executive officer of Ayala
Land, urged the police to “really look into other angles
to find out what happened.”
The
police must “explore other possibilities,” he said.
Ayala
revealed that the company had hired prominent experts
such as Stephen Etheridge, a chartered scientist of the
United Kingdom’s Science Council and expert on biogas,
and Burgoynes, an international consulting firm
specializing in forensic probes of fires, explosions and
engineering failure, to prove that a gas-and-fumes blast
was just that impossible.
But the
police said it had its own experts who earlier conducted
their own investigation that proved the blast was due to
gas and fumes that accumulated within the building.
Romulo
Asis, chief of the NBI Anti-Terrorism Division, said the
unit had not completely dispelled other possibilities in
the probe of the Glorietta 2 blast. The NBI is part of
the PNP-led task force investigating the explosion.
The
lesson we should learn is to keep our mouths shut unless
we are ready to talk.
raulbvalino@yahoo.com.ph |