|
RECRUITERS of Filipinos to
Japan
are tying that country’s immigration law to the
Japan-Philippines Economic Partnership Agreement (Jpepa)
currently under negotiation, believing that the former
is the key for the country to benefit from Jpepa.
The
Philippines will not benefit much from sending skilled
workers to Japan on a major consideration, according to
the president of the Philippine Association of
Recruitment Agencies Deploying Artists (Parada), Lorenzo
Langomez.
“If
Japan’s immigration laws will be favorable to us
[Filipinos],” then Jpepa could work, Langomez said.
One
provision in
Japan’s
immigration law that Langomez said he and Parada are
lobbying for is allowing Filipinos to petition family
members especially if these Filipinos will be working in
Japan for longer periods.
This, he
said, would also relax provisions in the Jpepa that, for
one, requires Filipino nurses to be trained in Japan for
three years.
If the
Jpepa pushes through, Langomez said Filipino nurses and
caregivers there will be called “nursing aides” and will
only be “promoted” unless they pass the licensure
examination in Japan after the third year of their
on-the-job training as required under the Jpepa.
In its
briefing paper to the Legislative-Executive Development
Advisory Council (Ledac), the Philippine Coordinating
Committee said Jpepa is just a free-trade agreement
between
Japan
and the Philippines but with additives.
Under
the Jpepa, the Ledac paper dated August 2007 said, trade
and movement of natural persons between the two
countries would be “simplified and harmonized.”
“For
Japan, Jpepa is the first bilateral EPA that includes a
provision of opening its labor market to foreign nurses
and caregivers,” said Hiroshi Yoneyama of the Japan
External Trade Organization Manila, said in a statement
early October.
Japanese
academician Mamoru Tsuda of the Osaka University of
Foreign Studies said the target 400 nurses and
caregivers to be deployed through Jpepa will remain to
be trainees.
“That
[employment situation] will put your nurses in a
vulnerable position,” Tsuda told a small Filipino
audience during a lecture at Miriam College’s Women and
Gender Institute held before the Philippine Senate began
hearings into the agreement.
Come to
my parlor…
LANGOMEZ
thinks the Jpepa’s provision opening Japan’s labor
market to Filipino health and other skilled workers is
only a “come-on” for remittance-reliant Philippines to
consider signing the treaty.
But they
are glossing over a serious matter, he says. This,
Langomez and Tsuda said is the requirement for Filipinos
to learn Nihonggo.
Langomez,
who knows a few Japanese phrases, thanks to his three
decades in the industry of sending overseas performing
artists to Japan, says Filipinos will have a hard time
knowing the 3,000 characters that make up the Nihonggo
language.
Tsuda,
who is married to a Filipina university teacher, says
even he has yet to master Nihonggo.
In the
workplace, the language barrier will be a major
issue—especially so that Japanese nurses, once the
Filipinos join them in the hospitals there, will also
bear the brunt of making sure that Japanese and Filipino
nurses communicate well.
“That is
why even the Japanese Nurses Association has voiced out
its protest to the Jpepa’s provision on nurses,”
Langomez said.
According to the Ledac paper, however, the Philippine
government can use official development assistance
funding to jump-start establishment and/or expansion of
Japanese language training centers in the country and in
Japan.
What
Tsuda also finds worrisome in the Jpepa is the nurse
trainees arrangement. For one, he says, the salaries for
them will be lower than those for Japanese nurses.
For
another, “Japanese nurses are mostly women, part-timers,
get old, and do not stay on in the work because of the
demands of such a job.”
“Japanese nurses already quit come their third year, and
cannot endure the detailed work,” Tsuda said.
Also, by
being nurse trainees, Tsuda said Filipino nurses will
also not be allowed to join unions, and will even have
their passports confiscated if they are suspected of
having such inclinations.
Tsuda
added that
Japan’s
employment sector relegates foreign workers into
trainees because “mainstream Japanese companies still do
not need cheap labor even in the near future.”
At the
same time,
Japan
also has a long cultural history of being an exclusivist
society which is reflected in its immigration policies.
It has
even yet to grant a general amnesty to undocumented or
illegal foreigners in Japan, Tsuda says.
…said
the spider to the fly
IF the
Jpepa were to be ratified by the Philippines (Japan’s
parliament has ratified the treaty already), it will
mark the first time Japan will open up its health sector
to foreign workers given the decreasing number of
Japanese nurses, and rising aging populations.
This is
an “opportunity” for the Philippines, says the Jetro
Manila office, drumming up the benefits of Jpepa to both
countries.
Yoneyama,
Jetro Manila’s research director, says Japan’s Health,
Labor and Welfare ministry has declared the worlds’
second-largest economy will need 400,000 to 600,000
caregivers by the year 2014.
But
Langomez wonders why is it that the provision in the
Jpepa is only for 400 nurses and caregivers, and the
arrangement for such is only a “pilot project.”
If Jpepa
pushes through, what Langomez wants to find out is “how
big will be the job orders”—this, he observes, seems not
explicitly mentioned in the Jpepa.
Langomez,
who owns the Manila-headquartered recruitment agency
JERR Services and Trading Corp., also thinks that when
it comes to nurses, Filipinos will try to go to the
“usual” destination countries such as the United States
and the United Kingdom.
“I am
not sure about
Japan,”
he says.
Data
from the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA)
on deployed overseas workers by country and type of
skill (from 1993 to 2006) show that the Philippines has
yet to deploy a nurse to Japan.
Eight
weeks of Senate hearings into the Jpepa went without
Jpepa being ratified, with its benefits to the
Philippines
still leaving senators dissatisfied.
According to the Ledac paper, without the Jpepa, the
professional services opportunities in Japan will be
opened to similar countries but not to the
Philippines.
But
until government officials can explain to senators how
Filipino health workers would be accorded “national
treatment” similar to Japanese workers, the agreement’s
fate would remain a debatable agenda. |