|
PROMPTED
by complaints of service providers and the Congress, the
National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) will amend
the rules on Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP.
The
complaints were basically about the high access charge
imposed by phone companies. The rates are negotiated
between the service provider and phone company, which
are then kept from being made public.
The
commission will call for a public hearing to address the
problem.
For now,
the NTC has recommended additional rules for the
service. A recommendation is to ease access charge—the
fee for calls that pass through a network carrier.
Under
the proposed rules, VoIP service providers that access a
public switched telephone network, or PSTN, should have
an interconnection deal with at least one duly
enfranchised and authorized PSTN operator.
The
operator is responsible for routing VoIP calls to and
from the networks of other operators and sees to it that
VoIP traffic routed to other operators are properly
identified. The VoIP service providers then pay a
transit charge not more than P0.25 per minute.
The NTC
also recommends that access charge for VoIP calls that
start and end with a certain PSTN should be at par with
the applicable access charge for national distance
calls, which is not more than P1 per minute.
The same
rules apply to VoIP providers requiring access to the
cellular mobile-telephone network, or CMTN. Here, VoIP
providers pay transit charges to the cellular firm,
which should also not be more than 25 centavos per
minute; the access charge should not be higher than
P.150 per minute.
“The
access charge paid to PSTN is different from the access
charge paid to CMTN because of mobility. There is
premium in mobility,” the NTC said.
VoIP
has been classified by the NTC as a value-added service.
Phone firms, such as Philippine Long Distance Telephone
Co. (PLDT), insist that VoIP is not VAS.
VoIP is
a technology, which allows phone calls to be made on
broadband Internet connection instead of a regular phone
line. VoIP services can work over a computer, a special
phone or a traditional phone with an adaptor.
PLDT
told the commission that this service is in place as
part of the voice telephony market. As such, only
licensed phone firms should be allowed to provide VoIP.
“It is
still the PLDT group’s contention that VoIP should not
be classified as a VAS as ruled by the NTC. Based on the
economic concept of ‘substitutability’ commonly adopted
in defining market and its scope, internet telephony can
legitimately be classified as part of the voice
telephony market,” PLDT added in a letter to the
commission. |