|
With the
Trade Union Congress of the Philippines (TUCP) voicing
its opposition to the plan of the Government Service
Insurance System (GSIS) and the Social Security System (SSS)
to have offshore investments, expect a healthy debate on
the plan of the two pension funds.
Already,
Sen. Loren Legarda has sought for a deferral in the
plan, citing projections that the peso-dollar rate could
improve further. Indeed, if the peso-dollar rate—which
has strengthened from the P56 to the dollar rate to P50
and then to P44.35—it would be prudent for the two
pension funds to first survey the field.
The TUCP
has a point in going against offshore investments since
it deprives the country of the huge amount that could
have meant economically benefiting the local economy.
“Both
the GSIS and the SSS should be investing their funds
here, where the money can directly and indirectly help
create new jobs, and produce multiple economic
benefits,” according to TUCP spokesman Alex Aguilar, who
reminded the GSIS and the SSS that the funds that they
plan to stash overseas represent the hard-earned
contributions of workers.
In our
take on the planned investments when it was announced
last week, we took the position that the offshore
investments smack of the lack of investment
opportunities here. True, the plan could bring in the
needed diversification for the pension funds, both of
which have to earn enough to fund the future pensions of
their members in their twilight years. But there are
actually other modes of investment that could provide
the needed income stream for both.
For us,
the GSIS and the SSS can actually set up a “hedge fund”
of sorts in funding the shortfall in the capital of
local banks as a result of the Basle II capital
adequacy-ratio requirements. This type of hedge fund can
be put to good use in funding the capital-challenged
commercial banks which now have to put in adequate
reserves to address the risks associated with the banks’
lending business. The GSIS and the SSS can even be
assured of better returns on their investments.
We are
sure that both the SSS and the GSIS have come up with
studies on the planned overseas investments to determine
if the said plan could bring in the required rate of
returns. As was pointed out before, the overseas foray
of the two pension funds stems from the needed
diversification in their investments, as well as the
lack of liquidity in the local market. Diversification
is a way for the two pension funds to be insulated from
violent gyrations that usually happen to listed stocks.
There is
no denying the fact, however, that Senator Legarda has a
valid point in raising the deferral of the move based on
the expectations that the peso-dollar rate could improve
some more. Hence, the GSIS and the SSS could see their
investments eroded immediately should the peso
strengthen some more vis-à-vis the dollar. What good is
it for the SSS and the GSIS to see their investments
rising in value when, in peso terms, there is that
sudden realization that the two pension funds would be
giving back their earnings from their investments.
The TUCP
also raised an equally valid concern. For the labor
group, the two pension funds are “not only duty-bound to
safeguard and grow the money, but also to invest the
cash in such a way that it would redound to the best
interest of our workers here.” The money to be invested,
said to be in the neighborhood of P63 billion, is seen
to create several economic opportunities when injected
into the local economy.
Even if
the planned offshore investments are invested passively
in equities, bonds and fixed-income instruments, there
are several economic benefits (already) associated with
keeping the money here, instead of abroad.
“In the
financial sector alone, P63 billion coursed through
local stockbroker-dealers and banks already represent a
lot of business. And the more business these local firms
get, the more jobs they create and the more taxes they
pay,” the TUCP stressed.
It is to
be expected that the planned overseas foray could
provide a healthy discussion of a number of issues
related to the returns, risks, investment thrust, the
need for diversification, as well as the limited
liquidity and choices in the local market.
Even
with the recent run-up in the local market to new highs,
the SSS and the GSIS still have to contend with the
problem of liquidity. The two cannot just dump their big
shareholdings should they require pension-fund needs
without influencing a downward spiral in the prices of
the listed issues they own.
This is
a problem associated with the Philippine market and this
has to be properly addressed by authorities. More
initial public offerings are needed to increase the
choices and allow for a more vibrant local stock
exchange.
Perhaps,
it is time for the stakeholders to really take a hard
look at the prevailing situation in the capital market.
The Bangko Sentral is, at least, at the forefront of a
financial literacy campaign, while the Securities and
Exchange Commission has been busy with its warnings on
investment scams.
All that
is needed is for the Board of Investments to require
companies that got tax and other incentives for them to
list on the stock exchange. That alone takes care of
expanding the number of blue chips such that the SSS and
the GSIS need not think of investing overseas.
E-mail: hugagni@yahoo.com |