|
‘On
Bullshit” is an essay on deception by Harry Frankfurter,
a retired Princeton University philosophy professor. It
helped me see through the stories peddled by the ZTE
plunder gang.
Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, summarizes
Frankfurter’s work:
“In the
essay, Frankfurter sketches a theory of bullshit,
defining the concept and analyzing its applications.
“In
particular, Frankfurter contrasts bullshitting and
lying; where the liar deliberately makes false claims,
the bullshitter is simply uninterested in the truth.
Rather, bullshitters aim primarily to impress and
persuade their audiences.
“Whereas
the liar needs to know the truth the better to conceal
it, the bullshitter, interested solely in advancing his
own agenda, has no use for the truth.
“By
virtue of this, Frankfurt claims, ‘bullshit is a greater
enemy of the truth than lies are.’”
Okay.
Here’s a
statement Frankfurter would call bullshit:
“When we
learned of an alleged bribery attempt in connection with
the broadband projects, we instructed that the matter be
discreetly investigated,” Mrs. Arroyo said.
Here’s
why Mrs. Arroyo’s claim is bullshit:
At the
Senate ZTE hearing, the administration representatives
present were asked if any of them were questioned by
anybody regarding the ZTE deal or if they even heard
about the probe Mrs. Arroyo was talking about. To a man,
they answered “No.”
Here’s
more bullshit:
Reacting
to Joey de Venecia’s “back off!” story, former Comelec
Chairman Benjamin Abalos said, “It’s a big lie. There
was no such meeting. Why don’t you ask Transportation
and Communications Secretary Leandro Mendoza if there
was such a meeting?”
Here’s
why the denial of Abalos is bullshit:
Mike
Arroyo admitted there was such a meeting in Wack Wack.
Now
here’s Mike Arroyo’s lawyer lying about that Wack Wack
meeting, using 77 words to conceal two words: “Back
off!”
“Mr.
Arroyo had gone to Wack Wack that day simply to play
golf when the young de Venecia arrived and sat beside
Secretary Larry Mendoza. Mr. Arroyo overheard the young
de Venecia following up his project proposal with
Secretary Mendoza. . . . De Venecia continued to follow
up his project proposal to Mendoza, prompting Mr. Arroyo
to remind the young de Venecia that he cannot be
involved in any government transaction because he is the
son of the Speaker,” said lawyer Jess Santos.
Here’s
Mike Arroyo mixing two parts bullshit and one part Jess
Santos:
“I never
said to him, ‘Back off.’ That is not even in my
vocabulary. . . I never pointed a finger at Joey de
Venecia. I only met him there, how can I do that? . . .
What I did is that I reminded him that he might be
guilty, he might be liable under the antigraft law
because he’s the son of the Speaker, he cannot, he
cannot deal with government contracts.”
That was
Mike Arroyo’s statement upon arrival from his
long-planned sudden trip to Europe.
Why do
people with unlimited resources bullshit and lie when
they can afford to buy spin?
For
those unfamiliar with the term “spin”, Wikipedia says it
is “a heavily biased portrayal in one’s own favor of an
event or situation.”
Let’s go
back to the story of Attorney Santos and add a paragraph
to modify it:
“The
young de Venecia responded by thrusting his face at Mr.
Arroyo, explaining the AHI bid in a rude and loud
manner. The young de Venecia’s behavior, especially
since it was the first time he met my client, startled
Mr. Arroyo, prompting him to point his finger and
exclaim, “Back off, please!”
Voila!
We transformed a lie into spin. We even placed “back
off” in a favorable light.
If
Attorney Santos used our spin, Mike Arroyo’s arrival
statement could have been less defensive and more
masculine:
“Of
course, I told him to back off. It’s the first time I
met the guy and he shoved his face right up mine.
. . . Coño! Que mal educado! He’s lucky I didn’t hit
him!”
I don’t
know how much the Arroyos spend for image makers, lap
dummies and autopen machines in the press, but whatever
it is, they are not getting what they pay for.
They
spend all that money and they still have to take all the
heat for the unabated criminal activities of everyone
around them. It’s ridiculous!
That
poor, hardworking woman and her kindhearted, ailing
husband are innocent of all wrongdoing. They’re
unwitting victims of rapacious relatives, friends,
business associates, political appointees and
bloodthirsty scalawags in the military and police
forces.
Now, did
I just tell a lie, bullshit or spin?
Buencamino writes political commentary for Action for
Economic Reforms (www.aer.ph). |