|
The
wildfire that is burning out of control through the
United States and Europe necessitates that we know
exactly what is going on with our financial
institutions.
All
monetary and financial transactions are based on trust.
The only way a person can maintain trust is with full
and complete information. A major problem for the West
right now is that depositors do not trust the banks or
their governments and banks do not trust other banks. In
that climate, people start withdrawing their funds,
banks raise interest rates for their lending to other
banks—as evidenced by the spike in London Interbank
Offered Rate (Libor) rates, and credit and money stops
flowing.
The
recent disclosure by Banco de Oro (BDO) of its exposure
to Lehman Brothers is a case in point. Because of the
proper, both ethically and financially, handling of that
situation, BDO held the trust of its customers.
This is
not the time to be optimistic, nor is it the time to be
pessimistic. This is the time to be realistic, and that
requires sound and factual information.
Everyone
has a critical stake in the local banking system, and
that requires looking far beyond the headlines and the
comments to the numbers. It is interesting and favorable
to note that during these times of the more “developed”
countries experiencing panic in the streets, the
Philippines reported the following data on the local
banks.
From the
BusinessMirror: “Bad loans held by universal and
commercial banks were down to 3.98 percent in July as
measured by the nonperforming loans [NPL] ratio. The NPL
ratio dropped from 5.18 percent a year earlier. Total
bad loans shrank 1.54 percent from June and were down
9.60 percent from a year earlier. [The end-July] NPL
ratio is the lowest recorded since the onset of the 1997
Asian financial crisis.”
Not
every financial institution such as Lehman and other
companies is run by stupid incompetents. As the West’s
financial system began showing problems as early as
2007, our banks were firming up their balance sheets
with careful lending and continued disposal of
nonperforming assets.
Further
in favor of our banks and another critical point, our
banks are preparing themselves even more in the very
unlikely event of future loan problems by more fully
protecting their financial position against defaults.
“While bad loans continued to shrink, the BSP [Bangko
Sentral ng Pilipinas] said the big banks’ NPL coverage
ratio—or provisions for bad loans—strengthened to 97.86
percent from 96.60 percent in June and from 85.29
percent in July last year.” What that means is that our
big banks put into reserve another 12 percent of the
amount of these bad loans just in case the value of the
NPLs falls and cannot be turned into cash. At a
97.86-percent coverage, these loans have been almost
totally written off, so that any money that might still
be recovered is a bonus.
Are we
facing a credit crunch where there just is not any loan
money available, an event that would slow the economy?
Not happening, and not likely. “Bank lending also shrank
from June, with total loans down 1.2 percent in July. On
yearly basis, however, total loans grew 17.9 percent as
of July 2007.” Yes, the banks have become more cautious
in the last months, but overall, 2008 has seen more
lending than 2007, despite the economic slowdown.
Not
everything is perfect, but never as bad as the
ill-informed headlines might lead you to believe. One
daily newspaper said residential property loan problems
were rising, misleading you into believing that maybe
the Philippines is next for a housing-loan crisis. It is
true that foreclosed real and other properties grew 1.15
percent in the just-ended third quarter of from the
second quarter of 2008. But, and it is a big but, that
was down 7.71 percent from 2007. Despite the terrible
financial situation during the last six months, the
picture is better than in boom-year 2007.
It is
true that the banks are experiencing a slight increase
in problems with their real-estate lending portfolio.
Problematic residential loans rose to 7 percent of total
lending to individual home borrowers, from 5.6 percent
at the end of June 2007 and 6.3 percent from the end of
the first quarter of 2008. Two factors are important in
order interpret the significance and to see if there is
any potential problem for the future.
What is
the loan-loss provision carried on the books of the
individual banks for any doubtful loans? Since 1997 the
banks have been very conservative and prudent in setting
aside money to cover potential losses. BDO is a good
illustration as it carries excess reserves that are more
than adequate to handle the approximate P4-billion
exposure with Lehman.
Is the
value of the underlying collateral—the real
estate—valuable enough to cover the loan? Please
remember that these Western banks would still be in fair
financial shape if the value of the housing assets were
not, in many cases, smaller than the face value of the
loan. Never will you see a bank in the Philippines loan
more than 80 percent of the value of the property. The
worst-case scenario is that the banks might have to take
back the property, said property worth more than the
loan. Our local property values are not in trouble due
to excessive supply or huge amounts of potential
foreclosures.
We need
to know the financial facts of our banks and, based on
those facts, we need to maintain our trust.
PSE stock-market information and technical analysis
tools provided by CitisecOnline.com Inc. E-mail comments
to mangun@email.com |