|
THE
Court of Appeals (CA) has dismissed for lack of merit
the petition of Central CATV, operator of SkyCable,
questioning the decision of the National
Telecommunications Commission (NTC) that the Lopez-led
firm has arbitrarily changed the channel positions of
television stations.
In its
decision, the CA said the NTC exercised regulatory power
over CATV operators such as “to fix, establish, or
control; to adjust by rule, method or established mode;
to direct by rule or restriction; or to subject to
governing principles of laws.”
The NTC,
in its decision dated April 25, 2003, ruled that Central
CATV violated the provisions of Memorandum Circular
4-08088 or the Revised Rules and Regulations Governing
Cable Television Systems in the Philippines when it
unilaterally rechanneled the positions of free-to-air TV
channels without securing the approval of the NTC.
It
ordered the cable firm to carry the free-to-air
television signal on its CATV system on the channel
number at which the station is transmitting, except when
technically unfeasible, in which case it shall be
assigned the next nearest channel, which does not cause
interference.
The
decision against Central CATV stemmed from a petition
filed by GMA Network in February 2003 seeking to
investigate the unilateral act of rechanneling the VHF
station of GMA in Metro Manila by SkyCable and affiliate
Home Cable and to order the said cable firms to return
and maintain the channel positioning of GMA’s VHF
television station at Channel 12.
A
complaint was also filed by KBP against SkyCable for its
rechanneling of UHF stations.
Sky
Cable filed a motion for reconsideration with the NTC
but the latter denied it. The cable firm then turned to
the appellate court to nullify the said order. |