|
ONCE
more I’m writing about our micro, small and medium
enterprises (MSMEs) because I’m fully convinced that
this big army of Filipino entrepreneurs could be our
newest batch of economic heroes. They could save us from
the impact of “painful recession.”
This was
the term used by President George W. Bush in warning
about the repercussions of the financial crisis in the
US economy. We all know that what happens to the US
affects the whole world. It is still the biggest market
for exports from almost all other countries in the
world, including the Philippines. For example, the US
market currently accounts for 17 percent of total
Philippine exports, just three percentage points less
than its share about five years ago.
As I had
pointed out, with the collapse of global financial
giants like Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns, and the
resulting turbulence in other financial markets, the
Philippines should turn to the MSMEs, which represent
more than 90 percent of all registered business
enterprises and the biggest group of employers in the
country.
I also
cited the need to increase access to credit, which is
one reason why our MSME sector is not developing as fast
as it should. One of the findings of the World Bank’s
International Finance Corp. (IFC) precisely indicated
that funding obtained by the MSMEs in the Philippines
from formal financial institutions represented between
11 percent and 21 percent of their total funding
requirements.
On the
other hand, banks and other financial institutions in
Thailand provide 34 percent of the financial
requirements of that country’s small entrepreneurs,
about twice the amount obtained by their Filipino
counterparts. It should not surprise us that shelves in
local supermarkets and groceries are filled with fresh
and preserved sampalok, patis and other items we used to
believe were indigenous, backyard Filipino products.
Yet, the
Philippine banking system has remained very liquid amid
the global credit crunch. The Bangko Sentral ng
Pilipinas (BSP) claims that the reforms being
implemented following the 1997 Asian financial crisis
have strengthened the domestic banks so that they are
able to weather the effects of the current US financial
crisis.
The BSP
has advised the local banks to go back to their
traditional businesses—lending and fee-based services—to
drive growth after the decline in their
securities-trading activities last year.
And the
banks appeared to have followed the BSP’s advice. The
outstanding loans of universal and commercial banks
expanded by 18.5 percent in July compared with 18.1
percent in June.
Lending
to production sectors, which has been accelerating since
May, grew by 16.4 percent in July. All sectors posted
growth in loans, except for fisheries, mining and
quarrying and financial intermediation, which suffered
contractions.
The
expansion in bank lending was led by the agriculture
sector, where lending grew by 25.8 percent. It was
followed by electricity, gas and water, which recorded a
58.9-percent loan growth.
The
wholesale- and retail-trade lending grew by 21.7
percent; transport, communication and storage 70.1
percent; and real estate, renting and business services
14.4 percent.
Lending
for household consumption grew by a slower 18 percent in
July from the previous month’s 22 percent as auto loans
registered a decline, in contrast to the previous
month’s double-digit growth following the continued rise
in fuel prices.
I agree
with Bangko Sentral Governor Amando Tetangco Jr. when he
said that bank lending is an important economic
indicator because it reflects confidence in the economy,
and this, in turn, is a key ingredient for the effective
functioning of the markets.
However,
I was a bit disappointed that the report on lending did
not mention loans to the MSMEs. Perhaps their loans were
buried in one of the numerous categories used by the
Bangko Sentral in its report.
Based on
the results of the IFC study, however, I believe there
is a tendency to neglect the MSMEs in favor of big
borrowers, especially the blue-chip companies.
It is
understandable for banks to give priority to prominent
companies that are known to be profitable, with good
management, lots of assets and lots of earning
potential. From the administrative side, a P100-million
loan to a good corporation is much easier and
cost-effective than a million-peso loan to 10 small
entrepreneurs.
On the
other hand, the energy and food crises, the high
inflation and the slowdown in the global economy are
already hurting the local “big boys,” both in the
financial and the industrial sectors.
Under
this situation, five defaulting small entrepreneurs out
of the 10 who borrowed a total of P1 million would
result in a very small loss for the bank than one big
corporation that fails to pay its P100-million loan.
In terms
of earning potential, I believe that MSMEs have more
than the big corporations. This is primarily because
they enjoy niche markets in the domestic economy—from
neighborhood stores to market vendors; from landscaping
contractors to home builders. The records also speak in
favor of the small entrepreneurs. They are less
delinquent than some big corporate borrowers.
I’m
advocating for the MSMEs not because of compassion,
although I feel personally close to them, but because I
am confident that they are the solution to the problems
caused by the global slowdown.
And I’m
not exaggerating when I say that the small entrepreneurs
could be our economic savior. We should not neglect
them.
You may send your comments/feedback to mbvillar_comments@yahoo.com. |