HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    SC to continue hearing ZTE
     
    By Joel R. San Juan
    Reporter

    EVEN as the Supreme Court said Wednesday it will continue to take up the petitions of Iloilo Vice Gov.Rolex Suplico and Amsterdam Holdings Inc. (AHI) seeking to declare unconstitutional the $330-billion national broadband network deal with China’s ZTE Co., the Solicitor General declared government’s intention to have them dismissed for being moot and academic.

    “The court will continue with the deliberations on the petitions against the ZTE contract unless it is manifested in court that it has been canceled,” said court spokesman Midas Marquez.

    This developed after President Arroyo scrapped the controversial contract on Tuesday, begging for understanding of her difficult decision in her meeting with President Hu Jintao during her state visit to China.

    In Manila, Acting Solicitor General Agnes Devanadera said since the project has been stopped, there is no more issue to be resolved.

    “I am just waiting for the formal notice from the Palace regarding the cancellation because as everybody knows, there is a case before the SC and there is a TRO [temporary restraining order], so if it has been canceled, there is nothing to be TROed anymore.”

    But what appears still to be valid, and not as moot as advanced by some, is Benjamin Abalos Sr.’s still being a member of the Commission on Elections, of which he is chairman.

    Former senator Francisco S. Tatad said the Abalos resignation is “bogus” and urged the House to push through with the impeachment.

    “There appears to be no record of Chairman Benjamin Abalos of the Commission on Elections having submitted a formal written letter of resignation to President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and of her having accepted such resignation, thereby rendering questionable the veracity of his announced resignation.”

    Tatad, who chairs the Philippine Democratic Caucus and the Citizens vs. Corruption Task Force, referred to the published statement of presidential legal counsel Sergio Apostol, that Abalos will be on terminal leave until his compulsory retirement on February 8, 2008. “[This] confirms the fact that Abalos has not resigned, and that there is no factual or legal basis for the House of Representatives to abandon the impeachment complaint against the Comelec chief.”   

    A formal letter of resignation is required and must be accepted by the President. “Otherwise, the announced resignation, which Malacañang wants now to translate into a mere terminal leave of absence, is completely bogus, and he would have succeeded in playing the entire nation for fools,” added Tatad.

    Earlier, the SC issued a temporary restraining order enjoining the implementation of the NBN deal following AHI and Suplico’s filing of the petition on August 1, alleging the deal is unconstitutional having violated RA 9184 or the Government Procurement Act, which requires that all public- procurement activities must be done through public bidding.

    Suplico further claimed the NBN deal violated the build-operate-transfer law which requires that in case of unsolicited proposals, “no direct guarantee, subsidy or equity is required.”

    Devanadera said as soon as she receives the notice, she would file a manifestation informing the High Tribunal about the scrapping of the NBN deal and at the same time praying for the dismissal of the case for being moot.

    “As soon as I get the formal notice regarding the cancellation, I will have to make the manifestation to the Supreme Court because if that has been cancelled, there is no TRO anymore. If the subject matter is not there anymore, the case will be dismissed and we will manifest that,” she said.

    The other day, Devanadera submitted to the SC government’s reply. In the comment to Suplico’s and AHI’s petitions, Devanadera reiterated the NBN deal with the ZTE is actually advantageous to government.

    She said the ZTE’s proposal emerges the cheapest when overall project cost is matched against the other proponents.

    At the Senate, which is investigating the NBN deal, senators heaved a collective sigh of relief over President Arroyo’s scrapping of the controversial ZTE-broadband contract after consulting Chinese officials, who earlier agreed to bankroll the project.

    OTHER STORIES

    Chinese miners invited to invest


    RP lags behind in meeting MDG goals


    Exporters tap hedging tool up to $3.8B


    Environmental accounting, serious business


    Anemic funds make for poor health index


    House panel okays changes to social-service outlays


    DOH, DFA protest ‘Desperate Housewives’ slur on RP doctors


    SC to continue hearing ZTE


    Task force to ‘sell‘ Jpepa


    PLDT axing ‘teletipid’ and ‘telesulit’ in Nov.


    AirAsia eyes new routes to Cebu, Davao