|
A FORMER
National Economic and Development Authority director
general urged the government to focus on local
government units (LGUs) as they may hold the key in
allowing the country to move forward and achieve higher
and broader-based economic growth.
Ateneo
de Manila economist Prof. Cielito Habito said given the
present issues and problems being faced by the national
government, focusing on developing LGUs would do the
government some good.
“Maybe
the future is in the hands of the LGUs because there is
so much good happening there. [consider them the] bright
ray of hope for the country,” Habito said in his speech
during the Fifth Development Policy Research Month in
Makati City on Monday.
Habito
said the government should be more supportive in helping
LGUs with policy research, particularly those that will
help them become more financially independent from the
Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA).
He said
that many LGUs still rely solely on the IRA and do not
get other revenue sources in the form of business
permits and real property taxes, which are supposed to
be the main sources of revenue of LGUs and not the IRA.
League
of Cities of the
Philippines
president and Mandaluyong City Mayor Benjamin Abalos Jr.
admitted this and said that some municipalities book
their IRA as their revenues. This was the reason why the
League has filed cases against 12 emerging cities.
“We’re
trying to have an advocacy of promoting grassroots
development and make [municipalities] more
IRA-independent,” Abalos said in his speech.
Meanwhile, the World Bank Group and the International
Finance Corp. (IFC) expressed support for select local
governments for possible financing through its
subnational finance department.
The IFC
said in a statement that LGUs are in a unique position
to participate in public-private partnerships,
particularly for subnational infrastructure projects.
Through this initiative, the IFC can directly finance
local development projects and promote commercialization
of subnational utilities.
“In a
decentralized environment like the Philippines, local
governments can determine the type and level of
financing needed for infrastructure projects in their
locality, evaluate potential private- sector partners
and help implement complex projects. Therefore, they are
able to make better decisions, leading to superior
outcomes,” IFC investment officer Valentino Bagatsing
said in a statement.
Bagatsing cited several examples of public-private
partnerships with local government involvement,
including the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, the
Chicago Skyway Toll Bridge and the Shanghai Pudong
district.
The IFC
said it estimates that there could be up to $1 billion
worth of potential projects in the
Philippines
that can be implemented at the subnational level.
“This
presents both an opportunity and a challenge for local
governments. Local chief executives need to become more
adept in understanding and structuring public-private
partnerships, particularly for infrastructure projects,”
Bagatsing said.
The IFC
said that the lack of adequate infrastructure is a
constraint to investment and business growth in the
Philippines. To accelerate infrastructure development,
the government recently announced plans to increase
total investment in the sector to 4.45 percent from the
current 2.2 percent of total gross domestic product. |