HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  

     
    Morales has got to go

     

    All the signs are pointing in one direction. These suggest that Customs Commissioner Morales, based on his bureau’s huge revenue-collection shortfall over the past 21 months, may, sooner than you think, be among the first major casualties of the Lateral Attrition Act of 2005.

    Morales has been the Bureau of Customs’ (BOC) top man for almost three years now. Assuming the administration will apply the attrition law without fear or favor, then Morales has made himself eminently “attritable” or dispensable.

    In 2007 the BOC was at least 7.5- percent, or P15.779-billion, short of its collection goal of P224 billion for that year.

    The 7.5-percent deficit automatically qualified Morales to be a candidate for the head-chopping block. If you go by the provisions of the Lateral Attrition Act of 2005, that is. What’s sad is that the BOC’s shortfall may be actually much bigger than earlier supposed. The figure could balloon to more than P18 billion—equivalent to nearly 9 percent short of target—when the final audit is done.

    The BOC’s collection performance for 2008, so far, has still been far short of expectations, although there has been a slight improvement in the collection performance of the Port of Manila and the Manila International Container Port.

    Probably sensing that his removal is only a matter of time, Morales only last week quietly slipped out of the country with his wife. He had left word that he would be away for a month, ostensibly to visit his daughters in the United States and Australia. He left with his wife, Shirley Morales, deputy customs collector at the Ninoy Aquino International Airport. The implication of the couple’s departure was unmistakable—they were on official leave with the full blessings of Malacañang, which could mean the executive secretary, a close ally of Morales, who is also a Batangueño.

    His sudden departure last week, of course, sparked all sorts of speculations at the BOC and in business circles. Importers, BOC employees, even kibitzers, talked endlessly about Morales and his “numbered” days.

    Had he finally been given his walking papers? Not far-fetched, some said. Otherwise, why would he suddenly leave for a monthlong sabbatical with his wife? The BOC obviously has a lot of catching up to do in its collections with the year’s end only a few months away.

    Even his closest aides until the other day were grudgingly conceding that strictly on the basis of the BOC’s below-par revenue-collection record in 2007, their boss had become “attritable” or dispensable.

    The business sector and the public at large, meanwhile, have been criticizing Morales for having been utterly ineffective in addressing the smuggling problem. During his watch, all sorts of smuggling operations have only become more rampant than ever.

    What added fuel to the speculation was Morales’s own statement to the effect that he was willing to give back to the government the P5.2-million bonus that the Department of Finance and the Department of Budget and Management had awarded to him for the bureau’s “outstanding” collection performance in 2006. Morales’s own statement implied that he himself might have felt the P5.2-million prize was undeserved.

    In 2006 the BOC supposedly exceeded its collection target by some P2 billion. Under the lateral attrition law, the bureau’s officials and employees were entitled to a share of the excess collections. Some P534 million was subsequently awarded to the BOC as its share under the system of reward and punishment set forth by the law.

    The claim that the BOC had surpassed its 2006 revenue goal was, however, later disputed by at least two senators who charged that Morales included in his bureau’s computations the noncash tax obligation of the National Food Authority amounting to P10 billion and advance tax payments by the oil companies amounting to P3 billion. In short, they were saying Morales had effectively overstated the BOC’s collections by P13 billion.

    Incidentally, it was largely based on the BOC’s padded 2006 revenue record that Morales became a full-fledged customs commissioner, or not merely an “acting” head.

    All these put together have only bolstered the case against Morales, whose leadership at the BOC has been consistently rated as nothing less than disappointing.

    Only yesterday, however, the waterfront crowd was jolted by the news that Morales and his wife were suddenly back in town! Nobody could say with certainty why Morales had cut short his trip. The only explanation that sounded plausible was that somebody big and powerful in the President’s office must have summoned him back.

    Still, while nobody’s really sure when the anticipated shakeup at the BOC will happen, the perception that Morales has got to go remains unshaken whether he is in town or in Timbuktu.

    In fact, even as we speak, I have it on good authority that Malacañang is already vetting one of two possible replacements for Morales.

    To be sure, many politicians have long been salivating for Morales’s job. But there are fiscal goals to be met, and, for crying out loud, the public is quite fed up with all the corruption that has been going on at the BOC.

    One of the two being vetted is definitely a shoo-in for the job, which could be described as a Herculean one, since it would involve a lot of cleaning up of this bureau’s stinking “stables.”

    This particular candidate for customs commissioner is about to retire from his present posting. He was only recently commended by a Palace spokesman for declaring he would readily take on any responsibility that President Arroyo may see fit to entrust to him.

    If he’s the President’s choice, then there is a strong possibility that he would be officially appointed by October 1. That is my fearless forecast. Fearless, because I’m never afraid to be proved wrong.  

    Omerta_bdc@yahoo.com

    OTHER STORIES

    Editorial: Taking stock

    WE have a recent Associated Press (AP) dispatch from Washington to remind us how Ronald Reagan defined economic downturns.

    read more

    Through the Looking Glass: The Close-Now, Hear-Later Doctrine

    Conclusion 

    This doctrine, fired from the hip to preempt asset dissipation against banks proven insolvent, is self-explanatory. Upon insolvency and where there is an imminent danger that an insolvent bank’s assets may be dissipated, then authorities invoke the doctrine.

    read more

    Sway: The nature of our leaders

    Almost always, nature offers the simplest explanation for a person’s why, what and how. This is the case even for politics, if only to explain President Arroyo’s decision to run in 2004 despite making earlier pronouncements that she wouldn’t, or why President Marcos opted for declaring martial law in 1972 to bypass the presidential election of 1973.

    read more

    Omerta: Morales has got to go

    All the signs are pointing in one direction. These suggest that Customs Commissioner Morales, based on his bureau’s huge revenue-collection shortfall over the past 21 months, may, sooner than you think, be among the first major casualties of the Lateral Attrition Act of 2005.

    read more

    The Essential Thing: Criminal, administrative raps vs the same person

    If a public official is charged criminally for an alleged wrongdoing proscribed by the penal laws, may he be charged administratively as well? Yes, since his single act of wrongdoing may constitute both a crime (for which he must be imprisoned) and a service-related misconduct (for which he must be disciplined).

    read more

    Servant Leader: Part I: Creation–a network of life

    We are blessed with a Cardinal who loves to teach us. Last month, this column featured the pastoral teaching of His Eminence entitled “Weakness and sickness—the way to fullness of life.” This week and the next few weeks, I will share with you the Cardinal’s latest teaching, Life is one!

    read more