|
WASHINGTON—Eclipse Aviation Corp.’s 500-model jet
experienced some of the same operating glitches flagged
by US inspectors before the plane was approved to fly,
the Transportation Department’s inspector general said
Wednesday.
Pilots
reported erroneous stall warnings, cockpit-display
failures and difficult flap movements in 2007 and 2008,
the inspector, Calvin Scovel, said in a testimony
prepared for a US House panel. It’s “troubling’’ that
many of the reports echo issues predating the plane’s
certification in 2006, he said.
The
government’s handling of closely held Eclipse will be
studied at a hearing on Wednesday of the House
Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, which is
probing whether aviation regulators are too cozy with
the companies they oversee.
Eclipse
won Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) design
approval in September 2006 for its six-passenger 500, a
new type of aircraft called a “very light jet.’’
Production certification followed in April 2007. In June
US safety officials issued an “urgent’’ inspection
recommendation for the 500.
Some FAA
workers said they raised safety concerns as Albuquerque,
New Mexico-based Eclipse went through the design and
production-approval stages for the 500. They allege that
the clearances were rushed by superiors in order to meet
company deadlines and win an FAA bonus.
The
FAA’s desire to promote very light jets may have
contributed to its decision to speed certification,
Scovel said. An agency “performance plan’’ in fiscal
2006 that put a priority on design approval for such a
plane may have led to “reduced vigilance,’’ he said.
The FAA
said on September 12 that an internal review of the
Eclipse 500 certification process recommended by Scovel
found that the plane was safe and was approved properly.
Peg
Billson, president of the aircraft division at Eclipse,
said the same day that FAA didn’t show the company any
special deference in approving the plane and that
service complaints are typical of any new model.
The
inspection recommendation was issued by the National
Transportation Safety Board following a pilot’s report
of an “uncontrollable’’ thrust surge as he tried to land
a 500 in Chicago on June 5. The plane later touched down
safely.
After
that incident, FAA engineers found software flaws that
should have been resolved before the jet’s design was
approved, Scovel said. The FAA awarded the production
certificate even with known deficiencies in Eclipse’s
supplier and quality-control systems, he said.
Four
years before the FAA backed Eclipse’s design, the
company was allowed to approve and document parts as
they were manufactured, even with no history in building
an aircraft, Scovel said. The agency found “numerous
deficiencies’’ on planes accepted and approved by
Eclipse inspectors, he said.
The FAA
also replaced inspection teams that had identified
deficiencies and allowed an engineer formerly assigned
to the Eclipse review to take a high-level position at
the planemaker without a cooling-off period, Scovel
said. (Bloomberg) |