HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm
ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
     
    Block that defense: how to make sure
    your constructive criticism works
     
    By Anne Field
     

    Why do top executives have difficulty receiving and responding to constructive criticism? Because so many high-fliers have received little criticism in their careers. As Chris Argyris, director emeritus of the Monitor Group (Cambridge, Massachusetts) and the James Bryant Conant Professor of Education and Organizational Behavior Emeritus at Harvard Business School, writes in “Teaching Smart People How to Learn,” a 1991 Harvard Business Review article, “Because they have rarely failed, they have never learned how to learn from failure.”

    The high aspirations and high standards that drive top performers, Argyris explains, are matched by an equally high fear of failure and a tendency to feel shame at not living up to those high standards. The result is that when receiving criticism, the highest-performing employees in an organization are the ones most likely to become defensive.

    Although getting high-fliers to take in and respond to honest feedback can be tough, it’s not impossible. Here are some tips for getting through your best managers’ defenses and getting your feedback heard.

    Prepare as if for a presentation. Louise Axon, head of the leadership and management development practice at The Forum Corp., a management training and consulting firm in Boston, recalls a tricky situation she once helped the CEO of a professional services company navigate. He needed to discuss performance issues with a senior manager who had received little feedback in his career, despite the fact that his arrogance and tendency to build his own power fiefdoms ran counter to the company’s collaborative culture.

    The CEO spent a week and a half seeking out and recording specific instances of the senior manager’s negative behavior, and then he organized what he gathered according to key themes. Then, when he sat down with the senior manager, he framed the discussion in terms of what the senior manager valued most—maintaining credibility within the organization—and showed him how each category of negative behavior worked against his own interests and those of the firm.

    Reinforce the message—repeatedly. Chances are, you won’t see improvement after one discussion. Indeed, it may take two or more conversations for the person even to acknowledge that there is a problem with her behavior.

    In the story above, the CEO gave the senior manager a week to mull over all the evidence of how his own negative behaviors were undermining his reputation and effectiveness, and then followed up with a second discussion. After that, the CEO not only met weekly with the senior manager but also stayed on the alert for opportunities to give this manager immediate feedback. For example, he called the executive right after a meeting in which the offending behavior was repeated.

    Customize the conversation. Getting your message heard will be easier if you tailor your delivery to fit the employee’s communication style. If your direct report likes to make quick decisions and is sometimes impatient with detail, then come to the point quickly and present only as much supporting detail as is necessary to establish the credibility of your point. If, however, your direct report is highly detail oriented, be prepared to walk step-by-step through specifics.

    Whatever the employee’s communication style, minimize her defensiveness by using nonjudgmental, neutral language. For instance, avoid “You did this” constructions, which can sound accusatory.

    Be aware of power signals. Think about what location says about power. If you choose your office as the setting in which to deliver unexpected and unwelcome criticism, then you might not want to sit behind your desk because to do so signals your greater power in the relationship. “The more equal the power, the more you’re likely to have a give-and-take,” says Michael Beer, the Cahners-Rabb Professor of Business Administration Emeritus at Harvard Business School. Sitting together at a small working table or in a pair of armchairs will establish more neutral ground.

    Consider what the culture communicates. If the corporate culture isn’t clear about what it takes to be successful, “then constructive feedback can only go so far,” says Joseph R. Weintraub, professor of management at Babson College (Wellesley, Massachusetts). He points to Whirlpool as an example of a corporation that communicates particularly well what it takes to be successful: It stipulates about a dozen dimensions of success, he says, all of which are essential for being promoted to one of the top seven positions in the company.

    If a company clearly values continual improvement and rewards its employees, including its top brass, for engaging in it, then it’s more likely that executives will be willing and able to get past their own defensiveness to hear what they need to do to get to the next level. 

    Anne Field is a Pelham, New York-based business writer.

    OTHER STORIES

    Block that defense: how to make sure your constructive criticism works

    Why do top executives have difficulty receiving and responding to constructive criticism? Because so many high-fliers have received little criticism in their careers. As Chris Argyris, director emeritus of the Monitor Group (Cambridge, Massachusetts) and the James Bryant Conant Professor of Education and Organizational Behavior Emeritus at Harvard Business School, writes in “Teaching Smart People How to Learn,” a 1991 Harvard Business Review article, “Because they have rarely failed, they have never learned how to learn from failure.”

    read more

    How they did it: charge what your products are worth

    In a world with too many choices, aligning a product’s price with its perceived benefits is critical—but many companies seem to miss this simple point. A good question for any company to ask itself is “What would Goldilocks think?” Instead of offering too few benefits—or too many—for a stated price, they must perfectly align benefits and price across the product category and the brand portfolio, finding the combination that is “just right.”

    read more

    Brain gain

    (Last of five parts)

    It’s easy for Filipinos to decide to leave the country to seek greener pastures. It’s much harder for these Filipinos, used to working abroad and earning sizeable sums, to come back.

    read more

    Talent Search

    (Fourth of five parts) 

    Today’s companies face five critical business challenges: globalization, technology, the quest for profitability through growth, intellectual capital constraints and the exigencies of continuous change. Regardless of their industry, size or location, these challenges require these organizations to continuously build new capabilities—a responsibility which, University of Michigan School of Business professor Dave Ulrich writes, human resources (HR) should embrace for these organizations to last.

    read more

    Civil Servants No More

    (Third of five parts)

    Jenny Balatbat left for the United States to teach kindergarten pupils, leaving behind her job as a teacher at the San Gabriel Elementary School in Bulacan.

    read more

    Employee-Retention Strategies

    (Second of five parts)

    MANAGING talent has become more essential to the private sector than it used to be. Companies are now beginning to dig up insights into managing talent that should allow them to deal with brain drain in a more organized way. What is bold, they say, is to make lemonades when life gives you lemons.

    read more

    THE WAR FOR TALENT

    (First of five parts)

    When the management of Fairchild Semiconductors, a global electronics firm, offered industrial engineer Manuel Villa, 32, a management job in Singapore three years ago, he didn’t hesitate to grab the offer.

    read more