|
Member-consumers of the Batangas Electric Cooperative II
(Batelec II), the country’s largest, are alarmed by the
Department of Justice’s (DOJ) decision to take over the
criminal cases filed by the National Electrification
Administration (NEA) against eight board members of the
cooperative who have been linked to alleged
multi-million-peso irregularities.
Marilyn
Cagimbal, Batelec II general manager, said most of the
cooperative’s members view with suspicion the memorandum
issued on August 23 by Justice Secretary Raul Gonzalez,
who had since gone on leave for health reasons, ordering
the city prosecutors of Lipa City and Tanauan City in
Batangas to turn over the cases to state prosecutors
from the DOJ for no apparent reason.
“All we
know is that one of the respondents in the case is said
to be very influential with the justice department and
even the courts, being a long-time mediaman covering the
justice and court beats in Manila,” Cagimbal said.
In
Department Order 713 that was issued on the same day
that he came out with the memorandum, Gonzalez
designated State Prosecutors Florencio de la Cruz Jr.
and Nolibien Quiambao as acting city prosecutors of Lipa
City to conduct the preliminary investigation on the
syndicated estafa case filed by the NEA against the
eight Batelec II board members.
Similarly, in Department Order 715, Gonzalez designated
State Prosecutors Phillip de la Cruz and Bernardo Parico
as acting city prosecutors of Tanauan City to take over
the falsification case filed by Batelec management
against two of the dismissed board members.
The
mediaman and seven fellow board members of Batelec II
were removed by the NEA on October 5, 2006, after they
were found guilty of gross mismanagement and grave
misconduct for entering into, among others, a
computerization contract worth P75 million without
public bidding and the purchase of 10 boom trucks that
were allegedly overpriced by almost 100 percent.
The NEA
order, signed by former Energy Secretary Raphael Lotilla
as chairman and three others, likewise ordered the new
set of Batelec II directors to file criminal and civil
cases against the dismissed board members, although the
eight were reportedly able to secure a status quo order
from the Supreme Court in December. |