|
Imagine
for a moment that your company had left it up to its line
managers to decide how to invest in information
technology. Some went with Windows, others with Mac OS and
an adventurous few leaped into Linux. But each manager
operated in isolation. Corporate had no way to determine
which of those IT spends actually added value to the
organization.
Crazy,
right? No company would dare allow a vital tool to be
employed in such an ad hoc fashion. But that’s exactly
what many organizations are doing with coaching.
Worldwide, organizations and individual executives will
spend about $1.5 billion on coaching in 2007, according to
the International Coach Federation in
Lexington,
Kentucky,
and most of that money will go to one-off engagements
initiated in piecemeal fashion.
If
coaching in your company is an improvisational affair,
apply the following five steps to make it the measurable
performance tool it can and should be.
1.
Articulate objectives.
Coaching used to be a tool for turning around
poor-performing or bad-behaving executives. But today,
coaching more often is called upon to help strong
performers move their game to the next level. And it’s as
likely to be used by managers in the middle ranks as it is
by those in the top tiers. Coaching is even becoming a
routine part of the onboarding process, according to the
ICF.
With this
greater range of use comes the risk that coaching will be
misaligned with an organization’s talent-management
objectives. So the first step is to articulate how it
should serve your talent-management strategy: Should it
focus on expanding skills in the senior ranks? Making
management transitions less disruptive? Building bench
strength to facilitate rapid growth?
Establishing specific parameters up-front will make it
much easier to keep your new or improved coaching program
in check as you move ahead.
2. Define
the details.
Once your
coaching program’s overall objectives have been nailed
down, define specifics:
§
Who merits
coaching in your organization and under what
circumstances?
§
Will you
use internal coaches or engage external ones?
§
Will
coachees commit to an action plan or a contract?
§
Will
sessions be confidential, or will coaches be obligated to
report sensitive information to management?
§
How will
you measure the engagement’s success? What will be the
consequences of failure?
3. Screen
coaches carefully.
This step is no less crucial to the success of your
coaching program than interviewing job candidates is to
your company’s overall success. But many HR departments
fail at this step and are then surprised at the
inconsistent results that follow, says Kate Ludeman,
founder and CEO of the Round Rock, Texas-based coaching
firm Worth Ethic Corp.
Whether
the coaches you hire are independent contractors or
employees of a global coaching organization, their
experience and expertise need to line up with your
coaching program’s overall objectives. Ludeman suggests
asking prospective coaches to describe how they have
helped organizations facing issues similar to the ones
facing yours. It’s critical that they be able to marshal
evidence that their tools and approaches actually work and
that they can adapt them to your organization.
4.
Establish a partnership with your coaches.
For coaching to support your company’s talent-management
objectives, coaches need to understand those objectives,
the corporation’s structure and key executives, and the
overall corporate culture. Susan Ennis, principal of the
Boston-based consultancy Susan Ennis & Associates,
recommends creating a standard orientation session for new
coaches. But, she says, don’t stop there: Communicate
regularly with them both by phone and in person about the
business and its goals. Doing so will help them do a
better job and quite possibly do it faster.
5. Measure
coaching’s outcomes.
Return on investment is a difficult concept to apply to
any talent-management endeavor, and coaching is no
exception. “For a training program,” says Ennis, “you can
measure how many people attained a certain level of
knowledge. But coaching is much more private in nature,
and there’s no cut-and-dried way to measure it.”
Assessing
a program’s overall effectiveness is dependent on how
clearly its objectives have been defined and then
establishing “reasonable proxies” to measure success
against those objectives, says Ennis. Say, for instance,
that a primary goal of your coaching program is developing
high potentials and building their loyalty to the company.
Measuring retention then becomes a reasonable proxy for
measuring the program’s success.
Coaching
is no different from any other performance-improvement or
talent-management tool in that its effectiveness is
closely tied to how clearly its goals are articulated. The
more precisely an organization can define what it wants
from its coaching program, the greater the chances that
the program’s results will meet expectations.
Andrew Park is a freelance business journalist who
contributes to BusinessWeek, Fast Company and The New York
Times. |