HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm
ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    Grist: performing a project ‘premortem’
     
    By Gary Klein
     

    Projects fail at a spectacular rate. One reason is that too many people are reluctant to speak up about their reservations during the all-important planning phase. By making it safe for dissenters who are knowledgeable about the undertaking and worried about its weaknesses to speak up, you can improve a project’s chances of success.

    Research conducted in 1989 by Deborah J. Mitchell of the Wharton School, Jay Russo of Cornell and Nancy Pennington of the University of Colorado found that prospective hindsight—imagining that an event has already occurred—increases the ability to correctly identify reasons for future outcomes by 30 percent. We have used prospective hindsight to devise a method called a “premortem,” which helps project teams identify risks at the outset.

    A premortem is the hypothetical opposite of a postmortem. A postmortem in a medical setting allows health professionals and the family to learn what caused a patient’s death. Everyone benefits, except, of course, the patient. A premortem in a business setting comes at the beginning of a project rather than the end, so that the project can be improved rather than autopsied. Unlike a typical critiquing session in which project team members are asked what might go wrong, the premortem operates on the assumption that the “patient” has died, and so asks what did go wrong. The team members’ task is to generate plausible reasons for the project’s failure.

    A typical premortem begins after the team has been briefed on the plan. The leader starts the exercise by informing everyone that the project has failed spectacularly. Over the next few minutes those in the room independently write down every reason they can think of for the failure—especially the kinds of things they ordinarily wouldn’t mention as potential problems, for fear of being impolitic.

    For example, in a session held at one Fortune 50-size company, an executive suggested that a billion-dollar environmental sustainability project had “failed” because interest waned when the CEO retired. Another pinned the failure on a dilution of the business case after a government agency revised its policies.

    Next the leader asks each team member, starting with the project manager, to read one reason from his or her list. Everyone states a different reason until all have been recorded. After the session is over, the project manager reviews the list, looking for ways to strengthen the plan.

    In a session regarding a project to make state-of-the-art computer algorithms available to military air-campaign planners, a team member who had been silent during the previous lengthy kickoff meeting volunteered that one of the algorithms wouldn’t easily fit on certain laptop computers being used in the field. Accordingly, the software would take hours to run when users needed quick results. Unless the team could find a workaround, he argued, the project was impractical. It turned out that the algorithm developers had already created a powerful shortcut, which they had been reluctant to mention. Their shortcut was substituted, and the project went on to be highly successful.

    In a session assessing a research project in a different organization, a senior executive suggested that the project’s “failure” occurred because there had been insufficient time to prepare a business case prior to an upcoming corporate review of product initiatives. During the entire 90-minute kickoff meeting, no one had even mentioned any time constraints. The project manager quickly revised the plan to take the corporate decision cycle into account.

    Although many project teams engage in prelaunch risk analysis, the premortem’s prospective hindsight approach offers benefits that other methods don’t. Indeed, the premortem doesn’t just help teams to identify potential problems early on. It also reduces the kind of damn-the-torpedoes attitude often assumed by people who are overinvested in a project.

    Moreover, in describing weaknesses that no one else has mentioned, team members feel valued for their intelligence and experience, and others learn from them. The exercise also sensitizes the team to pick up early signs of trouble once the project gets under way. In the end, a premortem may be the best way to circumvent any need for a painful postmortem.

     

    **** 

    Gary Klein is the chief scientist of Klein Associates, a division of Applied Research Associates in Fairborn, Ohio. He is the author of Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions, which was published by MIT Press in 1998, and The Power of Intuition, which was published by Doubleday in 2004.

    OTHER STORIES

    THE WAR FOR TALENT

    When the management of Fairchild Semiconductors, a global electronics firm, offered industrial engineer Manuel Villa, 32, a management job in Singapore three years ago, he didn’t hesitate to grab the offer.

    read more

    Grist: performing a project ‘premortem’

    Projects fail at a spectacular rate. One reason is that too many people are reluctant to speak up about their reservations during the all-important planning phase. By making it safe for dissenters who are knowledgeable about the undertaking and worried about its weaknesses to speak up, you can improve a project’s chances of success.

    read more

    Making the most of your coaching program

    Imagine for a moment that your company had left it up to its line managers to decide how to invest in information technology. Some went with Windows, others with Mac OS and an adventurous few leaped into Linux. But each manager operated in isolation. Corporate had no way to determine which of those IT spends actually added value to the organization.

    read more

    Technology giant looks to the region for growth

    IN the last decade or so, pundits have observed that drivers of the global economy have shifted to Asia, away from the traditional centers of economic power in the Western world. China and India alone are expected to account for half of the global output, growing at rates of 7 percent to 9 percent.

    read more

    Keeping tradition, continued innovation. Siemens still a trusted global technology brand

    GLOBAL networking is not an overnight success. It is a complex business set off by convention opposite novelty—reached through constant improvement while holding on to a created system or structure—thereby earning the faith and confidence of the market.

    read more

    RP’s telecommunications industry ready for next growth spurt

    RIDING the wave of growth can be an exhilarating thing, but the sober-faced Raj Pangrekar, president and country manager of Ericsson Philippines, is focused on what drives that growth.

    read more

    White House infighting common; Bush often disengaged, book says

    WASHIGTON—Karl Rove told George W. Bush before the 2000 election that it was a bad idea to name Dick Cheney as his running mate, and Rove later raised objections to the nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, according to a new book on the Bush presidency.

    read more

    Bio excerpt

    WASHINGTON—One of the most heavily criticized actions in the aftermath of the US invasion of Iraq in March 2003 was the decision, barely two months later, to disband the Iraqi army, alienating former soldiers and driving many into the ranks of anti-American militant groups.

    read more

    Slimming innovation pipelines to fatten their returns

    To achieve 3-percent annual growth, a typical $10-billion consumer products company needs to maintain an innovation pipeline worth up to $5 billion. Alarming figures, given that most managers underestimate—by a factor of two or three—the value they need to create through new products.

    read more

    CLOROX’S INNOVATION-MANAGEMENT APPROACH

    To take the up-front screening provided by platforms a step further, several years ago Clorox closely defined what types of innovation each of its many businesses—among them such household names as Armor All, Kingsford charcoal and Fresh Step cat litter—could pursue.

    read more

    The Eden of Sin

    Seen from the air, it’s a triangle with points east, south and west; but seen from the sea, the island of Panay looks like a crown or helmet because its mountain ranges form a cap akin to the native farmer’s salakot.

    read more

    High on coffee

    LA TRINIDAD—Perched on a dizzyingly steep slope, in a lush landscape with a brook and tall pine and alnos trees, Chit Juan took another step in her pursuit to continue producing organic coffee. The Figaro Foundation’s director hollowed out muddy soil in a patch in the jungle, cut around the black plastic covering of a seedling, popped the sapling into the hole and put the soil back.

    read more

    Winning: Acquiring culture

    When the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) merged in 2006 with the electronic-trading operator Archipelago Holdings, the world’s largest bourse acquired more than just technology.

    read more

    TWO YEARS AFTER KATRINA

    NEW ORLEANS—It’s difficult to nail down the last time this antique city was considered cutting-edge.  Was it the 1850s, when a coffee-shop owner invented the Sazerac cocktail?

    read more

    Piece by piece, devastated buildings find new life

    Brad Guy, an architect and researcher at Penn State University, is an advocate of “deconstruction”—not the thorny literary theory, but the idea of carefully taking apart buildings and making the component parts available to builders.

    read more

    A second line of defense

    Before Katrina, John Knost hadn’t really invented anything—unless you count the foam insulation he stuck on the edges of his apartment’s metal spiral stairs. They keep visitors from bruising their heads.

    read more

    Down by the riverside

    Developer Sean Cummings envisions miles of parks stretching along the East Bank of the Mississippi River.

    read more

    The Great Propagandist

    PROPAGANDA is in bad repute, it has been so for a long time. Thanks to Adolf Hitler, Joseph Goebbels and Lenin, principally, it has also taken on a sinister ring.

    read more

    A strong foundation

    EDUCATION Secretary Jesli Lapus wasn’t lying when he earlier declared that the opening of classes was generally smooth and peaceful. But he wasn’t giving us the entire panorama either.

    read more

    Legacy: A sense of history

    Sometime last year in 2006, there were two pieces of good news that may have gone unnoticed, but which greatly benefited the poor people of the world. And it is not about what the world’s richest nations have decided to do to help the situation on global poverty. Rather, it is about the personal philanthropy of the two richest men in the world: Bill Gates and Warren Buffet.

    read more

    A Harvard Management update classic: Get your new managers moving

    When Jacqueline Lopez arrived for her first day on the job as a new program manager at Intel’s Mobile Platforms Group, Jessica Rocha, her boss, handed her a calendar bursting with meetings.

    read more

    Dot-com pioneer

    Julia Theresa Yap has witnessed the growth of Pacific Internet Philippines from a pioneering Internet-service provider (ISP) in 1996 to the largest independent Internet communications service provider in the country today.

    read more