HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    If they want the perks, firms
    must be listed in the bourse
     
    By Max V. de Leon
    Reporter

    COMPANIES that have enjoyed or will be availing themselves of government incentives will soon be forced to list in the local bourse with the expected enactment of the Fiscal Incentives Rationalization Bill.

    This is because the rationalization bill will say in explicit terms that the public listing of firms registered with the Board of Investments (BOI) as mandated by the Omnibus Incentives Code (Executive Order 226) is mandatory and not merely directional as some groups claim, according to BOI Managing Member Elmer Hernandez. 

    The BOI, Trade Secretary Peter Favila and the Philippine Stock Exchange Inc. (PSEi) had been in a dilemma on how they could make the BOI-registered companies offer at least 10 percent of their firms to the public, as EO 226 mandates.

    This is after lawyers of these companies said the public-listing provision of EO 226 is not mandatory but merely directs the BOI to ask those that availed themselves of incentives, including up to 8 years of income-tax holidays and duty-free importation of equipment and raw materials, to offer shares to the public within 10 years from registration.

    Hernandez said that with the passage of the incentives rationalization bill, the BOI-registered firms can no longer use this excuse to avoid public listing.

    Among the big companies that have obtained government incentives and have been earning well since then, but remain unlisted, are Smart Communications and Pilipinas Shell.

    Also, Hernandez clarified the exemption provided by EO 226 on the listing of local firms whose mother companies are already listed abroad. He said these companies are not exempt since EO 226 is only talking of local listing.

    Hernandez made the clarification after a BOI-registered firm asked that it be excused from listing in the PSE since it is already listed abroad.

    He added that the companies being told to list are those that are registered with the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission. “We are now making this clarification based on the request of a company for exemption.”

    The BOI had released a list of 85 companies that should be listed because they enjoyed incentives and are qualified to be in the PSE roster based on qualifications. 

    OTHER STORIES

    GMA, Hu tackle ZTE deal


    ‘Reformed agrarian reform’


    If they want the perks, firms must be listed in the bourse


    ‘Tuna wipeout’ a price of RP market share in Japan?


    FVR skeptical high growth rate can be sustained


    Carrier tax base rate to be adjusted


    Option: Give poor cash to keep children healthy and in school


    ‘Tripwire’ against corruption laid


    BIR’s own survey makes BAT product mid-priced


    Qatar Airways’ target: More of rich fliers


    Chemrez to export unique resin to Asia


    Mining giants told: Engage host communities