|
FORMER
senator and Fair Trade Alliance (FTA) lead convenor
Wigberto Tañada labeled the exchange of notes between
Manila and Tokyo for the Japan-Philippine Economic
Partnership Agreement (Jpepa) as “useless” as it failed
to address the numerous constitutional issues that were
raised by several sectors against the deal.
Tañada
particularly cited Paragraph 4 of the exchange of notes
as a problematic clause as it stated that it serves only
to confirm the interpretation and does not modify the
commitments and obligations of both parties under the
Jpepa.
“If the
exchange of notes does not modify the Jpepa, then it
does not serve any useful function. Worse, it even
reaffirms the existing provisions, including those that
are inconsistent with our Constitution,” Tañada told the
BusinessMirror.
He said
this only shows the stubbornness of Japan to heed the
nationalistic calls of Filipinos and should push the
Senate to reject the deal.
Tañada
said the senators should not be swayed by the argument
of pro-Jpepa camps that the Philippines will miss the
boat if the deal is not ratified, considering other
countries in the region have already signed their
respective bilateral economic partnership agreements (EPAs)
with Japan.
He
pointed out that it is a different case for the
Philippines considering Thailand and the other Asean
countries managed to resolve the important
constitutional aspects of their EPAs.
“Why
can’t we duplicate what the other countries have
succeeded in doing?” he said.
The
exchange notes were supposed to convince the Senate that
the Jpepa will not indeed go against the provisions of
the Constitution, particularly those on the national
treatment of Japanese investments and the country’s
territorial waters that will be opened to Japanese
factory ships under the agreement.
Tañada
said with that Paragraph 4, the defects of the Jpepa
that have been pointed out by FTA and other civic groups
will continue to be part of the deal.
Also,
Tañada said the Senate should present the exchange of
notes to a public hearing before the senators put the
ratification to a vote.
“From
the start, there has been a problem with the
transparency on the part of the government. The Senate
should conduct public hearings again so the public will
understand what is really going on,” he said.
Tañada
said the senators should not be in a hurry in ratifying
the deal especially with these serious defects.
If the
Senate would immediately concur with the deal, Tañada
said the FTA will be forced to go to the Supreme Court
to challenge the Jpepa.
Rene
Ofreneo, FTA convenor, said the exchange of notes is
weak and have several gray areas, making it difficult
for the Philippines to legally defend its constitutional
mandates.
Ofreneo
said the “shared understanding” between the governments
of the Philippines and Japan that their respective
Charters will not be violated is not firm as it appears
to be a mere opinion. |