HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
     
    Hoping Nouriel Roubini is proven wrong

     

    It’s hard to forget your first Nouriel Roubini experience.

    Fifteen months ago, I watched an Asian Development Bank audience in Kyoto squirm and fidget as the chairman of Roubini Global Economics LLC gave his bleak, contrarian opinion that the global financial system was about to hit a wall.

    “After listening to you, I feel like I need a drink or a hug or something,” I joked to him afterward. Roubini gets a lot of such quips, and as his direst predictions about a once-in-a-lifetime bust in the US economy come ever closer to reality, I find myself hoping he’ll be proven wrong.

    Hats off to Roubini. How many times in the past year did we hear people say “this credit crisis is containable” or “the worst is over” or “subprime-loan problems won’t spread to other asset classes,” and the like?

    Roubini didn’t waver, and he took considerable flak for it.

    That said, Asia had better hope Roubini’s economic fears are proven wrong. Ditto for the gloomy predictions of Oppenheimer & Co. analyst Meredith Whitney, who recently was toasted on the cover of Fortune magazine.

    Perhaps the magazine-cover curse will kick in and the attention being tossed at Roubini, profiled last week by the New York Times, and Whitney means the worst really is over. Of course, they might say it’s just a matter of public perception catching up with reality—a financial system in tatters.

    Subprime system

    One reason to think Roubini won’t be proven wrong is his argument that the problem isn’t the subprime-mortgage market—it’s a subprime US financial system. Fixing the problems sending financial contagion around the globe will require tough decisions in Washington and reforms in Wall Street’s securitization system. And that’s hardly happening.

    How far Wall Street’s reputation has fallen since the collapse of Bear Stearns Cos. was revealed by the Aiful Corp. saga. Japan’s biggest consumer lender by assets threatened to sue Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in June after analyst Walter Altherr called Aiful “arguably insolvent” in a report.

    Lehman retracted the report earlier this month, yet not before Japan’s investment community had a good chuckle. The fourth-largest US securities firm, with a share price down 79 percent this year, calling another institution shaky? Talk about the proverbial pot calling the kettle black.

    ‘Muddle along’

    Even the best-case scenario for Asia looks gloomy. As analysts like Mark Matthews of Merrill Lynch & Co. in Hong Kong point out, the next few years will see Asia-Pacific markets excluding Japan “muddle along.” Wasn’t it just a year ago that investors were claiming Asia had decoupled from the US economy?

    The reasons Asia should hope Roubini eats some crow are many.

    For one, the region remains too reliant on exports. While Asia made some progress boosting domestic demand, slowing US growth will chip away at living standards from Seoul to Jakarta. For another, emerging markets may slide further if global investors become even more risk adverse.

    Mark Mobius, executive chairman of Templeton Asset Management, may indeed be right to call the decline in emerging-market stocks “overdone.” Still, a deep recession in the world’s biggest economy could accelerate those losses.

    Asia central banks amassed trillions of dollars of currency reserves in recent years, a move that won’t seem illogical if Roubini is proved correct. That cash will be needed to provide insurance to global investors that the region won’t see a repeat of its 1997 crisis.

    US contagion

    A decade ago, Asia was exporting financial contagion potent enough to send the Dow Jones Industrial Average down hundreds of points here and there. These days, the US is returning the favor, just as Diwa Guinigundo, deputy governor of the Philippine central bank, predicted to me a year ago. Hats off to Guinigundo; he was absolutely right.

    Where do we stand now? “One year later, in the US the lack of improvement in the money markets is still taking center stage,” Roubini said yesterday. And the Federal Reserve, on top of cutting its benchmark interest rate 325 basis points, continues to expand its liquidity facilities “without significant impact on credit creation.”

    That’s affecting emerging markets. For example, Roubini said, “The global credit crisis has exacerbated home-grown liquidity squeezes in countries like South Korea.”

    The question is how Asia would weather further weakness in the US. China’s boom has provided some cushion, yet officials in Beijing are busily working to tame inflation. It also would be a mistake to think a US recession won’t slam China.

    So here’s to Roubini for having a good couple of years of economic prognosticating. And here’s to hoping he’ll be less right in the future. Asia’s prosperity may depend on it.

    OTHER STORIES

    Editorial: Chaff from the grain

    A LOT of arguments have been made in recent weeks against the administration’s program for using cold cash as doles to the poorest of the poor, on the justification that they need help right now, when the twin tsunamis of high energy and high food prices are lashing the most marginalized everywhere.

    read more

    Outside the Box: Short-term market predictions

    By the time you read this, all of the following may have been proved true or completely wrong. However, one thing is for certain: the capital markets, including the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE), gave short-term traders a wonderful and potentially profitable ride last week.

    read more

    On Firm Ground: Advantages of international commercial arbitration

    The effects of globalization and the efforts of the government and the private sector to attract more foreign investments into the country have caused an influx of international commercial transactions. This heightened interest of foreign investors in the country certainly benefits the economy and can be sustained by making our business climate more conducive.

    read more

    Omerta: Lilian Hefti—‘attritable’

    Under the Attrition Act of 2005 (Republic Act 9335), the two major revenue-raising agencies of the national government are effectively governed by a system of reward and punishment based on their collection performance.

    read more

    Mirror on the wall: Raising money for government

    Two of the most feared agencies of the government, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) and the Bureau of Customs (BOC), were given up to the end of September to list down the most notorious among its personnel to dismiss them from the service.

    read more

    Sen. Edgardo J. Angara: Mobilizing domestic savings for development

    Last week the Personal Equity and Retirement Act (Pera) was finally signed into law, after pending for several sessions of Congress.

    read more

    William Pesek: Hoping Nouriel Roubini is proven wrong

    It’s hard to forget your first Nouriel Roubini experience.

    Fifteen months ago, I watched an Asian Development Bank audience in Kyoto squirm and fidget as the chairman of Roubini Global Economics LLC gave his bleak, contrarian opinion that the global financial system was about to hit a wall.

    read more