|
Two of
the most feared agencies of the government, the Bureau
of Internal Revenue (BIR) and the Bureau of Customs
(BOC), were given up to the end of September to list
down the most notorious among its personnel to dismiss
them from the service.
Firing
the misfits and the corrupt will not be an easy job for
Finance Secretary Margarito Teves.
As they
say, the wheels of justice grind so painfully slow that
before you know it, the accused could be back at no time
at all, looting us dry.
Sadly,
so many people want Teves out so that the thieves could
go on with their merry ways. Recently, he asked the
leadership of the BIR and the BOC to speed up their
evaluation of cases against people believed to be
performing below par.
Teves
heads the Revenue Evaluation Performance Board (RPEB),
an interagency body tasked with enforcing penalties and
giving rewards under the lateral attrition law.
The
evaluation process itself is at snail-pace, as if there
are people who are deliberately delaying it in the hope
that Teves would either forget about it or get booted
out.
Under
the Lateral Attrition Act of 2005, BIR and BOC personnel
who fall short of their goals by at least 7.5 percent
are to be either dismissed from service or face
reassignment.
For
sure, there are BIR and BOC people who are honest and
efficient, but they may be few. It is hoped that Teves
could weed out the corrupt at the Department of Finance
and its agencies, but that would be asking for a
miracle. Their lawyers and padrino would see to
it that Teves would fail in his endeavor, probably his
last in the term of President Arroyo.
Sometime
ago, Customs alleged it missed its target last year as a
result of unrealized macroeconomic assumptions. The peso
was much stronger than assumed when its goal for 2007
was set, it claimed.
For its
part, the BIR blamed low inflation that adversely
affected the collection of value-added tax, among other
taxes. Now that the inflation rate is at a record high,
the BIR should look for other excuses, it seems.
Meralco
case far from over The Court of Appeals decision that
the Securities and Exchange Commission has no
jurisdiction over corporate disputes and, definitely,
over the recent stockholders’ annual meeting of the
Manila Electric Co. (Meralco) could have ended the
management row between Meralco and the Government
Service Insurance System (GSIS). But it did not.
The CA
decision gave birth to more disputes and to more
questions of law.
Justices
were pitted against justices, and brothers against
brothers, as in the case of one justice against the
chairman of the Presidential Commission on Good
Government, and one friend against another, the briber
and the bribe taker.
Now, the
Department of Justice (DOJ) is also in the thick of a
new controversy that sprang from the filing of
syndicated estafa by a group called the National
Association of Electricity Consumers for Reforms (Nasecore)
against Manuel Lopez, chairman and chief executive
officer of Meralco.
Since
the DOJ is directly under the Executive branch, it could
not be helped if some people think the Meralco-GSIS row
is directly related to the feud between President Arroyo
and the Lopez family.
In a
resolution filed by State Prosecutor Jose de Castro, he
alleged that Meralco failed to submit a counteraffidavit
to the complaint of Nasecore that Meralco
misappropriated P889 million in consumers’ money.
Estafa
is a nonbailable offense. It’s a serious crime, so
serious that plaintiff Nasecore should have been, as
required by law, ordered to pay the corresponding docket
fee before the fiscals could even act on the complaint.
Memorandum Circular 4 provides that no preliminary
investigation of a criminal complaint shall be initiated
without the payment of a filing fee in accordance with
Department Circular 42.
Further,
a criminal case cannot be docketed unless there is proof
of payment of legal fees.
Nasecore
said Meralco declared as income P889 million in
consumers’ money, which represented part of the interest
earned by meter and bill deposits of the firm’s
subscribers.
It
further alleged that the P889-million income supposed to
be reimbursed to its customers has now accrued to P21
billion. Meralco said that even at a maximum 12-percent
per annum interest, the questioned amount could not have
reached that high.
The
filing fee for estafa is P1,000 if the amount involved
is P500,000, and an additional P10 for every P1,000
thereafter. Were the docket fees paid?
E-mail: raulbvalino@yahoo.com.ph |