|
THE
Supreme Court (SC) has reprimanded a Caloocan City
female judge, who convicted several members of the
Aquila Legis Fraternity 17 years ago for the death of
Ateneo law student Lenny Villa, for the use of
disrespectful language in her pleadings.
In a
29-page en banc decision penned by Associate Justice
Antonio Carpio, the Court warned Judge Adoracion
Angeles, of Branch 121 of the Regional Trial Court in
Caloocan City, that similar acts in the future shall
merit a more severe sanction.
“Respondent’s [Angeles’s] use of disrespectful language
in her pleadings is certainly below the standard
expected of an officer of the court. The esteemed
position of a magistrate of the law demands temperance,
patience and courtesy both in conduct and in language,”
the SC said.
The use
of improper language constitutes two of the 10 charges
filed by Senior State Prosecutor Emmanuel Velasco
against Angeles before the SC shortly after the latter
was investigated by the prosecutor for alleged multiple
counts of child abuse involving her grandniece.
The
child-abuse case was reversed by then justice
undersecretary Regis Puno and is still pending final
resolution.
In its
decision, the SC noted that Justice Noel Tijam, who was
assigned to investigate the case, also found Angeles
guilty of intemperate language in making statements
against now retired SC Justice Josue Bellosillo in her
pleadings before the Office of the President and the SC.
In the
said pleadings, the SC pointed out Angeles insinuated an
improper relationship between the complainant [Velasco]
and Bellosillo in her pleadings.
“Justice
Tijam found that ‘questioning the integrity of an
associate justice of the SC unavoidably casts a shadow
on the dignity of the Supreme Court as the highest court
of the land’,” the SC noted.
The SC
ruling dismissed the eight other charges filed by
Velasco against Angeles for allegedly quoting court
records improperly, falsification of public document and
introducing it as evidence in a judicial proceeding,
allegedly forcing the complainant in the child- abuse
case to sign an affidavit and introducing it as
evidence, visiting the secretary of justice while the
case against her was still pending and using court
sheriffs to serve pleadings in her behalf.
“We
agree that respondent should have been more circumspect
in her language. We have held in a long line of cases
that the judge is the visible representation of the law.
Thus, a judge must behave at all times in such a manner
that his or her conduct, official or otherwise, can
withstand the most searching public scrutiny,” the Court
said. |