|
CLAIMING
that the various lease and agribusiness agreements
entered into by the government with Beijing lacks
transparency and reciprocity, militant legislators
pressed the House of Representatives to investigate the
deals for possible legal and constitutional infirmities.
Party-list Reps. Risa Hontiveros of Akbayan, Satur
Ocampo and Teodoro Casiño of Bayan Muna and Liza Maza
and Luzviminda Ilagan of Gabriela filed House
Resolutions 79, 224 and 237, respectively, expressing
concern over these agreements’ implications on food
security, economic stability and the country’s overall
national sovereignty.
The
legislators said that besides lacking in transparency
and reciprocity, the deals tend to be favorable to the
interest of China to the detriment of the Filipino
people.
“These
agreements pose a serious threat to the country’s
agrarian-reform program,” Hontiveros said.
She
cited one contract that allows the lease of 1 million
hectares of land to a Chinese corporation for 25 years
without specifying the nature of the lands.
Hontiveros said the crops to be produced on these lands
are only for export to China, rendering the country’s
food supply vulnerable.
It was
learned that there were 31 memoranda of agreement (MOAs)
signed by the government and China including with some
private Chinese corporations all for the promotion of
bilateral trade and development in agriculture,
fisheries and other food- production ventures.
In House
Resolution 224, the legislators said: “Included are
questionable financial grants and concession loans, the
removal of some protective barriers on trade, a 25-year
lease of more than 1 million hectares of agricultural
lands—whose produce will be exported to China —and, the
utilization of lands for biofuel production intended for
that country’s consumption.”
They
said that based on a report of the Initiatives for
Dialogue and Empowerment through Alternative Legal
Services (Ideals) Inc., the 31 agreements cover a broad
range of obligations, with some of them perceived to be
anomalous.
Quoting
Arnel Mateo of Ideals, the legislators said at the joint
meeting of the committee on agriculture and food and
agrarian reform that the lack of transparency,
consultation and people’s participation are the reasons
these contracts are perceived to be anomalous.
Mateo
said the contracts are in direct violation of the 1987
constitutional provision on patrimony, which stipulates
that no foreign-owned corporation can lease agricultural
lands of public domain exceeding 1 million hectares. |