HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • Junk suits vs MOA, SC asked
     
    By Joel R. San Juan
    Reporter
     

    THE Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) has asked the Supreme Court to dismiss the petitions filed before it seeking to enjoin the government peace panel from signing the memorandum of agreement on ancestral domain (MOA-AD) with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).

    In a six-page motion and manifestation, Solicitor General Agnes Devanadera said the MOA-AD should undergo a thorough review due to the renewed Muslim atrocities in some areas in Mindanao.

    Devanadera disclosed that the Executive department will conduct further negotiations with the MILF to address the issues raised against the MOA-AD.

    “Circumstances have changed from the time of the intended signing of the MOA in Malaysia. Following the filing of various petitions questioning the constitutionality of the MOA, fighting in some areas in Muslim Mindanao had resurfaced led by some disgruntled groups of the MILF,” the Solicitor General said.

    It noted that the recent occupation by the “lost command” of MILF of some towns in Lanao del Norte resulted in the death of some 40 unarmed civilians.

    It added that the issuance of a temporary restraining order (TRO) by the Court, coupled with the present condition in some areas in Mindanao, warrant the review of the MOA.

    The OSG also insisted that the MOA-AD is not a done deal but merely “a codification of consensus points reached between the [government] and MILF peace panels and the aspirations of MILF to have a Bangsamoro homeland.”

    “The respondents are clear in their position that the actualization or realization of the aspiration of MILF to have a Bangsamoro homeland of their own shall be achieved only by complying with the existing legal processes, such as the enactment of appropriate legislation, amendment of the Constitution itself, as well as the holding of a plebiscite,” Devanadera added.

    SC spokesman Jose Midas Marquez said the OSG’s motion was discussed at Tuesday’s en banc session, and the justices agreed to order the respondents to reply with the motion until Thursday.

    Meanwhile, Makati Mayor Jejomar Binay, president of United Opposition (UNO); Aquilino Pimentel III, secretary-general of PDP-Laban; and former senator Ernesto Maceda have filed a petition before the SC seeking to permanently enjoin respondents, the government and MILF peace panels, from signing the MOA-AD or any agreement with terms similar to it.

    The petitioners asked the SC to nullify the MOA for being unconstitutional.

    They argued that in recognizing the Bangsamoro homeland as the “territorial space” for the Bangsamoro Juridical Entity (BJE), the political units directly affected by such change are all the political or local government units in the country and not only the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM).

    Thus, they said, the petitioners should have been consulted before the MOA-AD was finalized.

    The petitioners noted that the proceedings of the government and the MILF negotiations have been held in total secrecy, thus violating the people’s right to information on matters of public concern.

    “By recognizing the [BJE], without any constitutional or statutory grant of power to do so, and worse, delineating its territory, including ‘Internal and Territorial Waters,’ the respondent [government] peace panel grossly violated our Constitution,” they added.

    The government peace panel, the petitioners said, should be reminded to keep the people informed about its proceedings, to limit its commitments and promises to matters within the jurisdiction and competence of the executive department and to only make promises which are feasible, reasonable and achievable.

    “Raising the hopes of the other contracting party to magnificent heights only to disappoint and let them down is not the way to achieve the permanent peace that we all want to see reign in Mindanao and the rest of our country,” the petitioners said.

    Earlier, officials of the province of North Cotabato, Zamboanga City and Iligan City filed petitions seeking to stop the signing of the MOA-AD.

    OTHER STORIES

    Jan.- July deficit lower at P33.4B


    Mindanao business tries to stay afloat amid battles


    PCCI says MOA hurts peace, stability


    Expanded Ledac meets on Mindanao situation


    Junk suits vs MOA, SC asked


    China sees more jobs after Olympics


    Privatization goal of P30B uncertain; Petron on track


    Typhoon Karen seen to spawn rains till Friday


    DBP offers P7.65B in notes


    Export permits for minerals soon required


    Public, private agencies unite vs trafficking


    SC fines Roxas for causing ‘undue delay’