|
Take
your pick. It can be that the squeeze is on. Or, when it
rains, it pours. Or both. Either way, you can be right
on target.
No, we
are not talking here of the Church-sponsored “Oration”
for more rains at the height of the feared dry spell a
month ago, although that invitation was so powerful that
no less than Manila Archbishop Gaudencio Cardinal
Rosales has called for a halt to the prayers and urged
the faithful to set their sights elsewhere.
Rather,
we are talking of a squeeze (and a real one this time
around) on the scammers, here and abroad, who have
literally bilked millions of people of billions of
dollars in various kinds of financial skullduggery,
which threaten not only the markets but the very
stability of nations worldwide.
Yes,
sir, we are asking the faithful and, if they are so
minded, the Church leaders as well, to pray that the
latest bunch of scammers get their just due. The sooner,
the better.
We are
especially praying that Justice Secretary Raul Gonzales
and his crew at the NBI, headed by Director Nestor
Mantaring, stand firm and face up to the expected
pressures which will surely come their way as they
investigate the multibillion-peso investment scams
perpetrated by Performance Investment Products Corp. (PIPC),
PIPC Corp. and FrancSwiss Investments, to name the more
prominent and brazen operators locally of what has
turned out to be the latest version of the Ponzi schemes
of yore.
Reports
have it that NBI deputy director Victor Bessat and NCR
chief Ruel Lasala have filed cases of syndicated estafa
against 32 officers and employees of PIPC and PIPC Corp.
and at least 27 others from FrancSwiss Investments.
The
charge against PIPC and PIPC Corp. was based on the
complaints of 21 investors who were allegedly duped of
US$1.5 million (P75 million) by these companies.
On the
other hand, the agency took FrancSwiss to task for the
same offense of syndicated estafa, a nonbailable
offense, this time involving more than 30 people
investing $500,000 (P25 million).
In both
instances, the schemes used were eerily similar, except
that in the case of FrancSwiss, most of the investors
were lured into parting with smaller amounts through an
IT-based “virtual office,” while that of PIPC and PIPC
Corp. involved bigger chunks being siphoned off on a
face-to-face basis using glitzy offices and the
“wine-and-dine” sessions beloved by the rich and famous.
We will
soon see how these cases will proceed, even as we note
that already rumors are circulating that the DOJ and NBI
are being besieged by calls from all quarters to go
slow, and a coterie of law firms are lining up to defend
the accused, here and abroad, all of whom, we are told,
have moved notches up on the list of “favored clients”
of the credit-card companies.
Indeed,
the list reads like a combination who’s who of the old
de buena families and the newly minted. Aside
from the PIPC’s Singaporean originators, Michael H. K.
Lewis and Albert Chua (Chua Pwey Chan), the NBI named
PIPC Corp. GM and treasurer Cristina Gonzales-Tuazon,
corporate secretaries Ma. Cristina Jurado and Manuel
Gonzales, and incorporators Ernest Sy, Gabriel Dee,
Mario Lorenzo, Jonas Karl-Perez and Peter Donnely Barot
and 20 or so employees, many of whom are known
high-value customers of glitzy Ayala, Taguig and Ortigas
outlets, and even high-end Quezon City pubs.
Those
from FrancSwiss may be lesser mortals, so to speak, but
just as deadly in terms of their wily ways and spending
habits. They include FrancSwiss “virtual-office” honchos
Michael Mansfield (CFO) and directors Kurt Sundelman,
Rupert Benedict Do Vinci and Julia Rodriguez, and
Singapore- and Manila-based operators Roger Smith,
Singaporeans (again!) Benny Fong and Raymond Chan,
Eleazar Castillo and Jose Narciso Torrado III, among
others.
We are
hoping, of course, that besides filing the charges, the
NBI has already taken the necessary steps to put these
guys on the “travel ban” list and identified their
assets.
Experience tells us that schemes such as these best
succeed in a morally challenged environment of loose
controls, creaky legal processes and anemic, if not
long-winded, retribution. The DOJ and the NBI will have
to enjoin no less than Chief Justice Reynato Puno
himself to take a closer look, if not an active part, in
the prosecution of the guilty in these seemingly
unending bilking schemes.
And now
the countrywide stigma
Speaking
of squeezes, the deeper and deadlier squeeze, whose fate
has negatively impacted on the global financial market,
is that which is about to wipe out the multibillion
capital of the largest US mortgage lender by loan
volume, Countrywide Financial Corp.
Reports
show that the lender, whose shares are traded at the New
York Stock Exchange, lost 25 percent of its stock value
and drew down an entire $11.5-billion line of credit in
just a day last week. Whew! That is a squeeze like no
other in recent memory.
This
came after three mortgage hedge funds put up by top US
financial service institutions, Bear Sterns, Goldman
Sachs and KKR, and another mortgage company, Thornburg
Mortgage, reported similar liquidity problems that led
to an even wider and deeper squeeze in almost all
markets.
The
squeeze was particularly traumatic for the country,
which has been enjoying months of financial robustness
exemplified by a high-flying stock market and continued
peso appreciation.
Well, we
will now have to brace for a slowdown. We will just have
to pray that the same will not be as problematic as the
1997 financial meltdown, or even the 1983 crisis.
We are
being reassured that such will not be the case, but we
have concerns. We are concerned, for example, that
Finance Secretary Gary Teves continues to hitch his
budget stabilization plan on the “fire sale” of our
highly prized, profitable assets.
That is
a scheme which will surely bring us closer to the brink,
as we get lesser bucks for our assets and let go of
moneymakers which can provide more dividends in the
short term if only Teves says so and, of course, bigger
bucks in the longer term when the markets will not be as
volatile, if not as stiff, as we are now experiencing.
We are
concerned, too, about the fiddling some of our officials
seem to be doing with the government’s financial
position, be this with the 2007 and even the proposed
2008 budgets, the state of our GOCCs, including the
lending schemes of the housing agencies, and the
nonremittance of government contributions to the BSP,
GSIS and PhilHealth, among others.
These
financial hocus-pocus may spare some officials from
public censure, but will surely come back to haunt us
before we can even say: “tama na, sobra na.” |