|
NATIONAL
Security Adviser Norberto Gonzales agrees with the
observation that the antiterrorism law, more commonly
known as the Human Security Act (HSA), is unenforceable.
“We will
not touch the HSA, it is an accumulation of [previous
laws] by our police officers,” Gonzales said at the
Quijano de Manila Symposium at the Cherry Blossoms Hotel
in Ermita district. Other guests included Senate
Minority Leader Aquilino Pimentel Jr. and former senator
Francisco Tatad.
Gonzales
said that as the law stands, the law enforcement
agencies could resort to existing laws to prosecute
certain specific violations that could be defined as
part of an act to overthrow governments.
He said
critics of the law should go ahead and vent their anger
on Republic Act 9372, hoping that many of its
infirmities would get an airing and in its aftermath, a
real “antiterrorism law” that specifically applies to
specific persons would be crafted.
“I think
the present HSA is very difficult to implement,” he
declared, adding that the original proposal came from
Sen. Panfilo Lacson, and yet it was the opposition who
mangled the final version of the bill.
“It [HSA]
is not ours,” Gonzales stressed.
However,
Gonzales said that there is really a need for an
antiterrorism law because of the demands of many
countries that have close ties with the Philippines,
aside from lobbying by local groups.
The HSA,
signed by President Arroyo on March 6, 2007, has been
criticized by many quarters, especially those from the
Left and human-rights groups as being too arbitrary.
They fret that it would allow the state to infringe on
the constitutional rights of suspected members of the
Communist Party of the Philippines, the New People’s
Army and the National Democratic Front, who, under
different circumstances would not be labelled as
“terrorists.”
Tatad
said the HSA is unenforceable because “it is
conceptually confused and confusing.”
At the
moment, he said, there is only an academic consensus on
the definition of terrorism, although it gained currency
only following the 9/11 attack in the United States.
Of the
100 definitions of terrorism, Tatad said that the United
Nations definition of terrorism as the peacetime
equivalent of war crimes is presently in vogue, while
the revised penal code defines a terrorist as someone
who commits a crime in order to sow and create
widespread panic to coerce the government to give in to
unlawful demands.
However,
Tatad said that if that definition is applied, he
wonders how one coerces a system to commit rebellion,
coup d’etat or insurrection.
He said
the current Hsa, if applied, such as for detaining a
person more than three days, is a dangerous provision
because there is no way at present to distinguish
whether a person is an accused or a suspected terrorist.
Section
1 of the Bill of Rights says any act to deprive a person
of life, liberty and property without due process is
illegal, Tatad reminded the forum.
He sees
the need to craft a new anti-terrorism law, arguing that
“the law must be everyone’s law, and must not allow
those in power to use the law for their own purposes.”
He
added: “More than laws, we need an efficient and good
government [with a] fairly good intelligence- gathering
system.”
Gonzales
agreed with Tatad’s observations, but worries for
another reason: the law also penalizes arresting
officials with a fine of half a million pesos if they
are found to have detained a person illegally, and
another half a million pesos if the sequestration of his
properties is deemed to have been done illegally.
He said
that payment, as required by the HSA, would come from
the funds set aside for a specific military or police
organization.
“The
fear is that some individuals might connive and conduct
false arrest [so] that the two of them would gain
monetary consideration,” Gonzales said.
He noted
that the present HSA has 26 provisions, of which four
are against suspected terrorists and 24 are against the
implementors.
If such
is the case, Gonzales said that law-enforcement agents,
worried that their fund might be exhausted from too much
compensation for suspects, might as well produce
trumped-up charges against some persons just to convict
them.
Still,
Gonzales said that the country must craft a very
specific and unique law, because “we are now dealing
with terrorists, a different kind of
people.”
While
many people are cynical about the claims of government
on the existence of terrorists in our midst, he reveals
that the police and military have actually stopped many
acts of terrorism and neutralized some groups. He cited
the seizure of hundreds of kilograms of bombs from a
would-be terrorist who hid the explosives under the
false bottom of a vehicle, and the arrest of some Rajah
Sulaiman members in
Manila,
Bulacan and Pangasinan.
The
Rajah Sulaiman group is responsible for the “Valentine’s
Day” bombings where explosives were used in a bus in
Makati City. |