|
Sometimes it takes outsiders looking in to tell us that
not everything that we do is wrong, that we really ought
to indulge in self-flagellation perhaps only during
Lent, not year-round.
While
perennial critics have gone to town castigating the
administration for spending billions in food and other
subsidies for the poor, international institutions are,
in fact, praising it for doing so.
The
World Bank (WB) is unstinting in its support for the
Philippine government’s conditional cash transfer or
subsidy program for the poor.
WB
country director Bert Hofman says the subsidy scheme has
helped in addressing poverty in Brazil, Mexico and other
Latin American countries. He opines that “it is
justifiable because it works very well for development.”
Hofman
says the bank is even willing to work with the
Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) to
expand the scope of the program. It’s the DSWD that’s
now implementing several subsidy programs for the poor,
such as the distribution and sale of
government-subsidized rice in economically depressed
communities in close coordination with the National Food
Authority, local government units and Church-based
humanitarian groups like Caritas Manila.
United
Nations World Food Programme new country director and
representative to the Philippines Stephen Anderson,
likewise, believes the government is taking “correct
action” to help address the urgent needs of poor
Filipinos amid skyrocketing food and fuel prices.
Anderson
observed: “The [Philippine] government is mobilizing
[its] resources to address the immediate needs of the
people, but it takes time to cover all the needs of the
people.”
For his
part, Kevin Cleaver, assistant president for program
management of the UN International Fund for Agricultural
Development, said during his recent Manila visit that
the domestic rice problem “could be handled pretty
easily by the Philippines” in the immediate and long
term, given the measures that have been taken so far by
the government.
The
director general of the International Rice Research
Institute based in Los Baños, Laguna, Robert Zeigler, is
similarly upbeat about our prospects in surmounting the
global food crisis. The Philippines, he said, “relative
to a number of countries, adopted technologies quite
effectively and used them rather well” so that today,
rice production has gone up considerably.
Finally,
there’s the recent United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO) report that said 36 countries—nine in
Asia, two in Europe, 21 in Africa and four in Latin
America—now require external assistance to cope with
worsening food-supply problems. The FAO said these 36
countries would need assistance because of food
insecurity.
But the
Philippines is not on this list, which only goes to show
that the country has adequate food supply, thanks to
timely government intervention.
Sinister
hand in GSIS-Meralco tiff
Look no
further than the Palace by the Pasig for valuable clues
as to why the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS)
seems to be hell-bent on taking over the Manila Electric
Co. (Meralco), the largest power-distribution utility.
Embattled Appellate Court Justice Jose Sabio Jr. said in
his sworn affidavit that on May 30, 2008, he received a
phone call from his brother, Presidential Commission on
Good Government (PCGG) Chairman Camilo Sabio, who told
him he was going to be the third member of the division
assigned to handle the GSIS-Meralco case.
Justice
Sabio said he was surprised because he was not aware of
this at that time. Camilo then tried to convince him to
vote in favor of GSIS.
Taking
the witness stand for the second time at the resumption
of the investigation by a three-man panel of the Supreme
Court, Jose Jr. said Camilo, his older brother, had
asked him not to issue a temporary restraining order
against GSIS in its dispute with Meralco. The
power-distribution firm had asked the Court of Appeals
to nullify the cease-and-desist order issued by the
Securities and Exchange Commission to stop the Meralco
board election, which GSIS had sought. The case was
given to the appellate court’s Ninth Division,
temporarily headed by Sabio.
So why
would the PCGG chief take an extraordinary interest in
the GSIS-Meralco battle, if he wasn’t acting, wittingly
or unwittingly, on behalf of higher authority? Your
guess is probably as good as mine.
At the
Supreme Court hearing, retired Justice Romeo Callejo Sr.
asked whether the attempt by Camilo to influence his
brother was unethical and whether the PCGG chief should
be berated for trying to interfere in the case.
Justice
Sabio replied: “No, because he [Camilo] is my older
brother and I respect him. I only told him that I will
decide accordingly. Besides, there [was] no offer of a
bribe.” What transpired between him and his brother, he
said, was only a “conversation.”
But
Callejo observed that even if there was no offer of a
bribe, that was a criminal act under the Revised Penal
Code, because it constituted corruption of a public
officer. Sabio apologized to the court: “I’m sorry, Your
Honor.”
The
integrity of the entire Judiciary has been tarnished by
this episode. We hope the Supreme Court resolves the
case soon enough so that accountability can be
established and the judicial system can regain its
credibility in the eyes of the public.
E-mail: ernhil@yahoo.com |