|
Since
the Programme for International Student Assessment
(Pisa) started surveying student performance in 40
countries 15 years ago, Finnish students have been
continuously topping the overall scores.
Pisa
tests 15-year-old students of Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development nations and their partner
countries in math, reading and science.
Education is highly valued in Finland which,
incidentally, placed as the sixth most-competitive
economy in this year’s Global Competitiveness Report.
Because of its culture of innovation, Finland has
consistently ranked high in the report, even snatching
the top spot in 2004.
At a
time when globalization has pushed multinational
companies to look for talent and skills in developing
countries, Finland maintains its high-wage earning,
high-skilled labor force as a competitive advantage.
Education officials around the world, no less than from
the United States, have been visiting Finnish schools to
figure out its secret formula and apply it in their own
education systems.
There
are many factors contributing to Finland’s success, and
some of them might not even be applicable to realities
here in the Philippines. For instance, Finland has an
entirely different education system than ours. Schools
implement a nine-year comprehensive basic schooling,
after which students may choose to go to vocational
schools or upper-secondary schools.
Graduates from the latter must first pass an exam before
going to college, while graduates of vocational schools
may choose to work or pursue further studies. Other
analysts also point out that because of the
idiosyncrasies of the Finnish language, it is fairly
easier for students to learn.
One key
difference in Finland’s educational system is the
importance it gives to recruiting highly qualified
teachers. Teachers must have master’s degrees, and the
profession is highly competitive—40 people usually apply
for a single position. They also have more academic
freedom in planning their classes. Teachers pick the
books they will use for class and customize lessons to
meet national standards.
By
contrast, in the Philippines, 59 percent of nonscience
and nonmath majors are teaching science and math at the
high-school level, and of the 815 Teacher Education
Institutions, only 27 percent comply with the minimum
standards established by the Commission on Higher
Education for Teacher Education.
Consequently, our students have been lagging behind in
international education standards. For instance, our
students have performed poorly in the 2003 Trends in
International Mathematics and Science Study, where they
ranked 41st in science and 42nd in mathematics out of 45
countries.
At the
same time, our global competitiveness has been
consistently waning. While Finland has remained in the
top 10 of the Global Competitiveness Report, we have
been stuck at the bottom half. In 2001, the Philippines
ranked 49th out of 102 countries. Seven years later, we
slid further down to 71st among 131 countries.
Technical education is a crucial aspect of
competitiveness, and one way of ensuring quality
education is by making sure the people who provide them
are qualified. This is one of the issues currently being
tackled in the Congressional Commission on Science
Technology and Engineering. We’ve got to bring this
issue to the center of policy debate and action, lest
our children—in which our country’s future rests—suffer
from incompetent teaching.
E-mail: edgardo_angara@hotmail.com. Web site:
www.edangara.com. |