|
Most
Lopez-owned companies—with the exception, perhaps, of
the ABS-CBN television-radio network and the tollways
company in North Luzon—are dependent on the Manila
Electric Co. (Meralco) for their survival, their
financial sustenance and growth. By implication, if, for
some reason, the Lopezes lose management control of
Meralco, these companies would lose their lifelines and
simply drop dead.
That is
why we have absolutely no reason to doubt that for the
Lopezes, being in control of Meralco “is a matter of
life and death.” The grandeur and power of the Lopez
financial empire depends, to a large extent, on Meralco.
These
companies were described as “like so many sucklings
feeding on the cash cow that Meralco has become to the
Lopezes” by Winston Garcia, president-general manger of
the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS).
It is
this very dependence that has made Meralco charge power
rates that are among the highest in the world. Thus,
Garcia believes that hacking off the Lopezes’ hold on
Meralco is the only possible way to bring the
long-yearned-for relief demanded by its 4.4 million
customers.
“Meralco’s rates are higher by at least P2 or P3 per
kilowatt-hour [kWh] when compared to the rates being
charged by other local power distributors. This is
because Meralco has been sustaining the Lopez-owned
companies through its copious cash flows. If you want to
dramatically lower power rates, the only solution,
really, is to free Meralco from this family’s clutches.”
Garcia
has often been quoted in the media as saying that
Meralco power rates have soared to unbelievable levels
because of “the expensive power it buys from Lopez-owned
power generating companies; its self-deals with other
Lopez companies supplying it with meters, transformers,
cables and the like; its bloated and overpaid
bureaucracy; its noncontributory pension fund; and its
numerous pass-on charges.”
The GSIS
has also maintained that Meralco’s rates could be
immediately lowered by P1 or P2 per kWh if its onerous
contracts with the Lopez-owned First Gen Corp. and First
Gas Corp. for 55 percent of its total power purchases
are all thrown out.
That is
why, by the way, Meralco cannot be expected to come
clean and lay bare those contracts to public scrutiny.
The GSIS, which owns some 37 percent of Meralco, was
itself rebuffed when Garcia asked for copies of those
“sweetheart” contracts.
Estrella
Elamparo, the feisty legal counsel and spokesperson of
the GSIS, points out that “Meralco buys only about 10
percent of its power from the Wholesale Electricity Spot
Market [WESM] and about 35 percent from the National
Power Corp. [Napocor]. The rest comes from the
Lopez-owned power-generation companies with which
Meralco has signed automatically renewable long-term
contracts that are lopsidedly favorable to the
generation companies but are conversely adverse to
Meralco customers.”
Whenever
Meralco gets a drubbing for any rate increase, which is
more often than not, it always says with a straight face
that it is merely charging exactly what it paid out to
the generation companies, not a single centavo more. Of
course!
Meralco’s duplicity came to the fore once again only
recently. Elamparo asked: “Why is it that out of the
recent 70-centavo-per-kWh reduction in the generation
rate of Napocor, Meralco customers got only a mere
4-centavo cut?”
In
contrast, she says, Meralco found an excuse to raise its
generation rate by 2 centavos per kWh in August based on
the small amount of electricity it buys from the WESM.
Elamparo
also charges Meralco of “shortchanging” or overcharging
its 4.4 million customers in its July billing cycle.
Actually, the overcharging was discovered by Pete Ilagan,
president of Nasecore, the electricity consumers’
watchdog group.
Based on
Nasecore’s finding, which Elamparo describes as
“dismaying,” it appears that Meralco not only
overcharged its customers by 26 centavos per kWh in
July, it also had the temerity to follow through in
August with the 2-centavo increase in generation charge.
She says
that “while Meralco trumpeted that it would reduce by 30
centavos its generation charge for July, it actually
reduced it by a mere 4 centavos as can be seen from its
billing statements for the month.
“There’s
a discrepancy of 26 centavos between Meralco’s announced
reduction of 30 centavos and what Meralco customers
actually got, which was a cut of only 4 centavos per
kWh.”
The
“smoking gun,” she says, is Meralco’s own billing
statements for that month.
In
effect, Meralco had once again overcharged its customers
by 26 centavos per kWh, or P26 for every customer using
100 kWh a month, P52 for every customer consuming 200
kWh, P78 for each one using 300 kWh and P104 for each
one using 400 kWh.
In the
past, the Supreme Court had caught Meralco overcharging
its customers on at least two occasions. In both
instances, the High Court ordered the power firm to
return to its customers the illegal charges, including
the P30 billion in income taxes that it had passed on to
its unsuspecting customers from 1994 to 2002.
Elamparo
expresses the hope that the newly installed chairperson
of the Energy Regulatory Commission,
Zenaida Cruz-Ducut, would get to the bottom of how
Meralco does its math in rate reductions and increases.
“There’s
something terribly wrong in the way Meralco computes its
charges. Why only a 4-centavo cut in the face of a
70-centavo reduction in its generation charge? Now it
wants an additional 2 centavos for August on the basis
of an alleged increase in WESM rates. . . .”
It’s not
the first time Meralco has come under suspicion for
being less than honest in its rate computations. Long
before Garcia and his outspoken attorney came into the
scene, Meralco’s customers have harbored this uneasy
feeling that they are being had. But there was not much
they could do. They were, and still are, helpless
“captives” of a monopoly. Their hands are tied by their
own fundamental need for electricity, in their homes and
workplaces. If they refuse to pay Meralco’s outrageous
rates, they get cut off.
It’s
clear that the Lopezes have been violating the mandate
of Meralco’s charter to procure electricity for its
customers at the least cost. Unfortunately, the takeover
bid by the GSIS seems to have been frustrated and put on
hold by a bribery scandal at the Court of Appeals.
Omerta_bdc@yahoo.com |