|
APPARENTLY pressured by accusations that it is involved
in extrajudicial killings, which it repeatedly denied,
the Armed Forces has started pre-trial investigation
against personnel and officers accused of human-rights
violations.
Lt. Col.
Bartolome Bacarro, the chief of the Armed Forces public
information office, said that if investigators find
probable cause against the accused, they will be tried
by the five general courts martial that have been
created by Gen. Hermogenes Esperon Jr., Armed Forces
chief of staff.
Bacarro
refused to identify the soldiers involved, saying that,
“They are still innocent otherwise proven guilty.”
But
Bacarro said the military personnel and officers have
long been in custody or restriction since the cases were
filed in the civil courts.
“He [Esperon]
has directed the conduct of pretrial investigation on
the cases that are now pending before the civil courts,”
said Bacarro.
“If the
pretrial investigation later on determines that there is
prima facie evidence that would really merit the conduct
of general court martial proceedings, then these five
new courts will be trying these cases,” he added.
Bacarro
clarified that these cases are all human rights-related,
but not necessarily killings.
Asked if
the officers linked to the disappearance of
agriculturist Jonas Burgos, son of press freedom icon
Jose Burgos Jr., are included in the pretrial
investigation, Bacarro said: “As to specific
individuals, all specific cases, I’m not in a position
to disclose kung sino-sino ang mga ito, but
definitely the guidance that everybody who has a case
filed . . . civil courts would be subjected to pretrial
investigations.”
Bacarro
reiterated that the Armed Forces is not tolerating
wrongdoings by its men, saying that the creation of the
military courts and the conduct of the pretrial
investigation against those allegedly involved in
human-rights violations is a manifestation that its
leadership is really bent on resolving these cases and
punishing those who committed the crime.
“The
[military] institution as a whole does not commit
human-rights violations. It is not the policy of the
Armed Forces of the Philippines to do that. That is the
very intent of this . . . the creation of the five
general courts martial,” Bacarro said.
Bacarro
said families or relatives of victims of human-rights
abuses by soldiers can go straight to the military to
initiate court-martial proceedings. He assured that
investigations would be pursued on their complaints “if
it is warranted.”
****
Party-list solon hits ‘name and shame’
By Fernan Marasigan
Reporter
WHILE
many congressmen welcomed the planned “name and shame”
campaign against frequent absentees in the House of
Representatives, a party-list representative is opposing
the move, saying that legislators are mature and
professional enough to know their duties and thus should
not be subjected to humiliation.
Party-list Rep. Joel Villanueva of the Citizens Battle
Against Corruption (Cibac) said the campaign of House
Speaker Jose de Venecia Jr. is uncalled for, saying
being the “father” of the House of Representatives, he
should not put to shame his “children.”
Villanueva, who was among the congressmen who almost had
a perfect attendance during the 13th Congress, said that
instead of implementing such a campaign, the House
leadership should employ the incentives and
disincentives to those religiously attending the session
and those who are not.
“Bakit
kailangang ipahiya? JDV [de Venecia] is the Speaker
and the father to the House, bakit gusto niyang
ipahiya ang mga anak niya?” Villanueva asked.
He said
de Venecia should stop issuing “press releases” or
statements that would be detrimental to the reforms he
would want to implement in the House of Representatives.
An ally
of de Venecia, Lakas Rep. Monico Puentevella of Bacolod
City also opposed the move, saying that while the House
leadership must try all ways and means to improve the
image of the House of Representatives, that is not the
way to do it.
“This is
not the way to do it. It’s more of quality time and not
on quantity of attendance,” said Puentevella.
But
Lakas Rep. Antonio Cuenco of
Cebu
City
supported the plan, saying it would instill discipline
among its members and promote better performance by the
House.
Cuenco,
chairman of the committee on foreign affairs, said the
“name and shame” drive may be painful for the House
members, but it is vital for the institution to become a
truly performing Congress.
“We will
certainly support Speaker Jose de Venecia on this form
of reform in the House. It is sad and unfortunate that
things have to come to this point, but we believe such
reforms are necessary, that the House be more decisive
in disciplining its ranks,” said Cuenco.
Cuenco
expressed hope that lawmakers will be able to implement
the “name and shame” plan that calls for the publication
in newspapers of names of their truant colleagues,
because it could be the best prescription to cure the
absentee-lawmaking image of the House brought upon it by
some of its errant members.
“We
should start the 14th Congress on a good note by
discouraging absenteeism. The sooner we implement the
plan to publicly identify frequent absentees, the
better, as it would demonstrate our serious intent to
institute reforms in the House,” said Cuenco.
For his
part, Lakas Rep. Prospero Nograles of Davao said the
move of the leadership is a step in the right direction.
“And we
hope that fewer congressmen will absent themselves from
here on,” Nograles said.
Earlier,
de Venecia and Majority Leader Arthur Defensor disclosed
a plan to periodically buy one-fourth page
advertisements in newspapers where they can list down
the names of frequent absentee lawmakers. |