|
THE
Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) has refused to make an
immediate and definite decision regarding a wharfage fee
cut intended to lower shipping costs and reduce prices
of local exports.
PPA
general manager Oscar M. Sevilla admitted last week that
he did not ask the plan to be tabled during the agency’s
board meeting, a move that may be detrimental for
locally-made goods whose prices are higher when sold
abroad, owing to the strong peso.
Meanwhile, the said move allowed the PPA buy more time
and collect more dues from the port users. The agency
only received a fraction of its regular rates for three
months after Filipino business groups—including the
Philippines Exporters Confederation—was successful in
convincing Malacañang to impose a fee reduction.
Last
month, the said group undertook a last ditch effort in
convincing the port agency to continue charging
discounted rates beyond July 20.
Saddled
with bankrolling big-ticket port projects, the PPA has
always insisted that it is not responsible for
high-shipping rates in the country. The agency said that
it only receives an estimated 5 percent of the total
shipping expenses paid by the port users, including
exporters.
Last
April 20, the PPA released an order which imposed
reduced wharfage rates for three months. Instead of
charging P259.70 for every twenty-foot metal container,
the agency only imposed a P20 fee.
During
the three-month period, the PPA said that the rate cut
cost the agency P9 million in lost revenues.
Earlier,
Sevilla said that the PPA remains unable to continue the
rate reduction since this will sap its finances,
weakening its ability to continue the construction of
various port programs.
Sevilla
said that of its 28 current projects scheduled to be
completed by 2008, only half will be finished by this
year.
“Where
are we getting the money to continue the projects?” he
said.
Moreover, the port agency’s revenues are expected to dip
as the Philippine cargo volumes in the country are
dropping ever since the start of the year.
From
January to April, volume decreased by close to 3
percent, or about 1.3 million metric tons as both
domestic and foreign cargo declined. |