|
Now it’s
the Makati Business Club (MBC) which is asking: Is there
a secret deal between the heirs of President Ferdinand
Marcos and the Presidential Commission on Good
Government (PCGG)?
This
column had earlier asked that question, pointing out
that the claim of Rep. Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. that his
family owns the Lucio Tan group of companies could
boomerang against him.
The MBC
wants the agency to explain recent developments that
hint to a secret arrangement between the government and
the Marcos heirs.
The MBC
last week expressed concern over “the brazenness” of the
claim of the Marcoses that they own companies which the
PCGG has claimed to have been ill-gotten by the late
president.
The
claim appears to be contrary to logic. How in the world
will the younger Marcos justify his family’s ownership
of companies and assets that run to billions of pesos
when they did not have that kind of money, as they had
reported to the Bureau of Internal Revenue?
If the
PCGG succeeds in proving that the Marcos wealth was
ill-gotten, where do Bongbong, Imelda and Irene end up?
Behind bars?
My own
belief is that they are not that stupid to testify
against Lucio Tan for nothing. There must be an
arrangement that suspicious minds have to uncover, if
they can.
We don’t
know if, indeed, there is such an arrangement or
compromise to bring logic to this otherwise illogical
conclusion that Bongbong, et al, are willing to go to
jail just to prove that they used illegally sourced
money to take over companies belonging to other people.
There is
no such deal, according to the PCGG people, whether
individually or collectively.
“The
PCGG reiterates its position that there is no deal with
the Marcos family,” declared Nick Suarez, PCGG
spokesman.
“We do
not have any idea as to the motivations of Bongbong. But
as far as PCGG is concerned, there is no agreement. We
deny allegations or whatever suspicions some sectors
have of an existing alliance or agreement with the
Marcos family,” he stated.
Marcos
Jr. has demanded that the assets of his cronies—friends,
as defined by the dictionaries—be returned to their
“rightful” owners, meaning Marcos and family.
“Rightful” may not be the right word insofar as some
people might find the word “rightful” contrary to their
senses.
“The
attempts by the Marcos family to recover assets hidden
by the dictator’s cronies raise questions to which the
Filipino people deserve answers,” the MBC insisted.
“After
21 years since Marcos fell from power, why is his family
asserting their claim now? In so doing, are they not
exposing themselves to legal and tax liabilities? Do
they have a secret deal with the Arroyo administration
to give up part of the assets in order to escape
liabilities?” the MBC asked.
Another
Marcos child, Imee, former congressman from Ilocos
Norte, is also claiming ownership of a part of GMA-7.
GMA, of
course, is not owned by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo
(GMA). How it came to be is anybody’s guess, but in the
past, the name probably stood for Greater Manila Area.
Last
week, too, Imee went to the Securities and Exchange
Commission to stop the initial public offering of GMA-7
network.
She
claimed that the Marcos family was the actual owner of
the stake of the Duavit family in the broadcast giant.
During
the Marcos era, many suspected that Imee owned GMA-7,
but nobody could attest to the truthfulness of the
suspicion.
Now Imee
is declaring to all that she indeed owned and owns the
television station. How’d she do it?
As we
have asked in an earlier column: Does Bongbong want to
hang himself?
E-mail: raulbvalino@yahoo.com.ph. |