|
MORE
phone firms are opposing the application of Philippine
Long Distance Telephone Co. (PLDT) to operate in areas
not yet covered by its authorization.
Bayan
Telecommunications Inc. (Bayan) said the phone giant’s
request for the issuance of a certificate of public
convenience and necessity (CPCN) to establish, operate
and maintain telecommunications services in certain
areas not yet covered by PLDT’s authorization will
result in unfair and ruinous competition.
“The
operation of the proposed service would constitute
needless, wasteful and uneconomic duplication of
existing telecommunications services provided by Bayan,
resulting in a waste of valuable resources,” said Bayan.
The
phone unit of the Lopez group, in its opposition
submitted to the National Telecommunications Commission
(NTC), asked that PLDT’s application be denied.
“The
approval of the instant application, provisionally or
otherwise, is and will be injurious to public interest
and violative of declared national and state policies,”
added Bayan.
Another
phone company operating in the province of Camarines Sur
said the NTC cannot act on PLDT’s application.
L.M.
United Telephone Co. Inc. (Unitedtel) said PLDT failed
to state in its application which of the areas applied
for are unserved or underserved.
“The
commission is mandated to give priority to unserved
areas. Where there are existing operators of the same
service in the same area applied for, the application
must allege the ultimate facts required by the
regulations showing that the area is underserved,
otherwise, the commission cannot validly act on the
application,” said Unitedtel in a filing with the NTC.
Unitedtel and Bayan are already providing the same
service in the areas where PLDT wishes to operate.
Unitedtel said there is already a glut of telephone
lines and saturation of the market in these areas.
“There
is now an unhealthy and cutthroat competition between
Unitedtel and Bayan for each other’s existing
subscribers.
To grant
PLDT its application will violate our rights to be
protected from overlapping operations guaranteed under
the Telecoms Public Act,” added Unitedtel.
The
Southern Telecommunications Co. Inc. (Sotelco) also told
the NTC that it was opposing PLDT’s application. It
does not want PLDT to operate in Region 10.
Earlier,
the wireline unit of Globe Telecom also said the entry
of PLDT in areas already served by other carriers would
result in ruinous competition and a waste of valuable
resources since there would only be duplication of
services.
Innove
said there is neither the need nor urgency of a new
carrier such as PLDT to provide wireline service and/or
ICT (information and communications technology) enable
service or facilities in areas that are already being
served by existing carriers.
“The
entry of PLDT will only bring about ruinous competition
by competing carriers. It is a well-known fact that
where capacity exceeds demand, ruinous competition would
naturally result,” said Innove.
The
40-percent unsubscribed telephone density nationwide
experienced some four years ago still prevails until
now, noted Innove.
“The
market is flooded with LEC [local exchange carrier]
services as well as data and information networks with
advanced and usable functionalities utilizing the
technology being used by the existing carriers and other
operators. There is thus absolutely no demand for the
service applied for,” added Innove.
PLDT
wants to expand the geographical area of its network to
cover the entire country. Thus, even after the NTC
issued in April a provisional authority for it to
operate in regions 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, ARMM,
and Caraga, the phone giant filed recently another
application. |