HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    Not all countries welcome ‘open skies’
    policy, says CAB executive director
     
    By Claudeth Mocon
    Correspondent
     

    CONTRARY to the claims that open skies is welcome in many countries, the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) has disputed that it is freely embraced as part of their national aviation policies.

    Lawyer Carmelo Arcilla, CAB executive director, during the aviation forum at the Asian Institute of Management sponsored by the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said countries in general liberalize at varying paces suitable to their respective needs, on a case-to-case basis within the bilateral and multilateral framework.

    Open skies proponents, like the Freedom to Fly Coalition, have claimed that many countries now are reportedly openly advocating for open skies to justify the coalition’s attempt to pressure the Philippine government into declaring a pocket open skies policy in Clark, Cebu and other places.

    Arcilla said generally, economically developed countries with very low population base like Dubai, Bahrain and Singapore tend to strongly advocate for open skies because they have practically no market to open.

    “On the other hand, an open skies regime will allow their strong carriers to access foreign markets and feed their hubs,” he said.

    He said another category of countries that strongly advocate for open skies are large nations with well-developed economics and dominant carriers that stand to benefit from an open skies regime.

    “One more category of countries that readily embrace open skies are those with marginal economies, small markets and insignificant international aviation industry to chance upon the possibility of reaping dividends in an open aviation regime,” he emphasized.

    To dispute that the countries cited by open skies advocates are freely embracing open skies, the CAB head revealed the following information:

    §          China’s open skies policy only applies to Hainan Island, not the entire country. However, the grant of rights to this destination is within the bilateral or multilateral framework. Overall, China’s aviation liberalization policy is incremental and selective.

    §          Vietnam’s liberalized policy for selected provinces is implemented on a bilateral and reciprocal basis.

    §          Cambodia’s open skies at Siem Riep applies only to charter flights but with no 5th freedom privileges.

    §          Singapore’s open skies policy is based on strict reciprocity and exchanges of traffic rights through bilateral or multilateral negotiations and subject to market demand.

    §          India’s so-called open skies policy grants unilateral privileges only for cargo services but sets limits on foreign carriers’ passenger services.

    §          The United Arab Emirates now requires reciprocal rights in bilateral negotiations that enforce capacity restrictions.

    §          Hong Kong’s so-called liberal policy just recently rejected Cebu Pacific’s application for charter flights between Clark and Hong Kong. This is notwithstanding the fact that the Philippines has granted Hong Kong carriers liberal rights between Hong Kong and Clark.

    Arcilla said the CAB is supporting progressive liberalization as this policy enhances competition, investments and market opportunities without unduly and severely curtailing the rights of national carriers to equal opportunity and fair competition.

    “The Philippines is pursuing a national and progressive approach to liberalization through the expansion of traffic rights in existing air services agreements, liberalization of charter services, creation of pocket open skies or liberalized hubs and active participation in regional and multilateral liberalization initiatives,” he said.      

    OTHER STORIES
    Asean meet discusses faster removal of NTBs

    AN ASEAN body is now discussing in Manila some schemes that would speed up the elimination of nontariff barriers (NTB) in intra-Asean trade in pursuit of the region’s integration into a single market by 2010.

    read more

    Are bus operators making money to justify higher tax?

    FOR former pop singer Claire de la Fuente, part of the legacy left by her husband, who passed away late last year, is a case filed by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) against Philippine Corinthian Liner.

    read more

    2 slots open for WB-funded infrastructure projects

    THE possible removal of two World Bank-funded projects from the country’s infrastructure blueprint, the Comprehensive Integrated Infrastructure Program (CIIP), may give way to other possible projects indicated under the WB’s Philippine Country Assistance Strategy (CAS) for fiscal year 2009 and 2010.

    read more

    Bulacan holds lechon festival to show safety of pork meat

    CITY OF MALOLOS—A “lechon Festival” was held Monday at the Hiyas ng Bulacan Convention Center in this city to assure consumers that hog meat from Bulacan province is safe to eat.

    read more

    Not all countries welcome ‘open skies’ policy, says CAB executive director

    CONTRARY to the claims that open skies is welcome in many countries, the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) has disputed that it is freely embraced as part of their national aviation policies.

    read more

    More phone firms oppose PLDT application to operate in new areas

    MORE phone firms are opposing the application of Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. (PLDT) to operate in areas not yet covered by its authorization.

    read more